[VOTE (RESTATED FOR CLARITY]: Release Nightly Build as RC1

[James Turner <tu...@blackbear.com>]

Everyone getting tired of this yet? :-)

Ok, at the request of those who want to know what they're voting on,
here's the vote restated.  I think there's general consensus that the
patches since 1.1b3 are important enough to use a nightly build instead
of the beta directly.

Question 1:

+1 means you want to take the latest nightly build for RC1.

+0 Who cares

-1 You want another beta before RC1

Question 2:

+1 means you want struts-el included in RC1 and the final release.

+0 Who cares

-1 You want struts-el packages seperates with it's own release cycle

My votes:

Q1: +1
Q2: -1

James Turner
Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
turner@blackbear.com

Author: 
    MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
        Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
    ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002

Co-Author: 
    Struts Kick Start
    ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002

Forthcoming:
    Java Server Faces Kick Start 
    SAMS, Fall 2003



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: [VOTE (RESTATED FOR CLARITY]: Release Nightly Build as RC1

[Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>]

With respect, James, question 2 and question 1 are complex and can't be 
resolved in a single iteration.

If I vote +1 for question 2, my answer to question 1 is null, since I 
wouldn't favor any release with the packages combined (have you stopped 
beating your keyboard yet?) -:0)

So in response to question 2, I would have to vote

-1 = Anything in contrib should not be bundled with a core release and 
must have its own release cycle

and in response to question 1, I would have to vote

NULL = I'm not in favor of any release from any codebase that bundles 
code from the contrib folder with code from the shared folder.

And I do care. =:)

Of course, depending on how question 2 is resolved, I might be able to 
change my response to question 1.

-T.

James Turner wrote:
> Everyone getting tired of this yet? :-)
> 
> Ok, at the request of those who want to know what they're voting on,
> here's the vote restated.  I think there's general consensus that the
> patches since 1.1b3 are important enough to use a nightly build instead
> of the beta directly.
> 
> Question 1:
> 
> +1 means you want to take the latest nightly build for RC1.
> 
> +0 Who cares
> 
> -1 You want another beta before RC1
> 
> Question 2:
> 
> +1 means you want struts-el included in RC1 and the final release.
> 
> +0 Who cares
> 
> -1 You want struts-el packages seperates with it's own release cycle
> 
> My votes:
> 
> Q1: +1
> Q2: -1
> 
> James Turner
> Owner & Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC
> turner@blackbear.com
> 
> Author: 
>     MySQL & JSP Web Applications: 
>         Data Driven Programming Using Tomcat and MySQL
>     ISBN 0672323095; SAMS, 2002
> 
> Co-Author: 
>     Struts Kick Start
>     ISBN 0672324725; SAMS, 2002
> 
> Forthcoming:
>     Java Server Faces Kick Start 
>     SAMS, Fall 2003
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 


-- 
Ted Husted,
Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: [VOTE (RESTATED FOR CLARITY]: Release Nightly Build as RC1

["David M. Karr" <dm...@earthlink.net>]

>>>>> "James" == James Turner <tu...@blackbear.com> writes:

    James> Everyone getting tired of this yet? :-)
    James> Ok, at the request of those who want to know what they're voting on,
    James> here's the vote restated.  I think there's general consensus that the
    James> patches since 1.1b3 are important enough to use a nightly build instead
    James> of the beta directly.

    James> Question 1:
    James> +1 means you want to take the latest nightly build for RC1.
    James> +0 Who cares
    James> -1 You want another beta before RC1

    James> Question 2:
    James> +1 means you want struts-el included in RC1 and the final release.
    James> +0 Who cares
    James> -1 You want struts-el packages seperates with it's own release cycle

Q1: +1
Q2: +1

-- 
===================================================================
David M. Karr          ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
dmkarr@earthlink.net   ; SCJP; SCWCD




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>