You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2011/07/23 00:34:02 UTC
ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available for download
The first hbase 0.90.4 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.4-candidate-0/
Release notes are available here, [1]. ~sixty issues have been
resolved since 0.90.3
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.90.4?
Please vote +1/-1 by next Friday, July 29th.
Yours,
The HBasers
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12316406
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Eric Charles
<er...@u-mangate.com> wrote:
> There were 2 java processes left-over from a previous timed-out Test.
> I didn't have the reflex to look for open ports.
> Could have been a MiniHBaseCluster also with master and region servers.
>
Good on you Eric. Some test must not be cleaning up after itself. If
a failed build because of TestShell failures, seems like we should
look at previous build to see what failed there and check that it is
cleaning up minihbasecluster after itself.
> Btw, running 'mvn test' on 0.90.4 release candidate gives here 1 failure:
> testWritesWhileGetting(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion)
> Time elapsed: 0.19 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<\x00\x00\x00<> but
> was:<\x00\x00\x00:>
>
I just tried it and it passed for me. It failed though up on jenkins
on the above test,
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/242/testReport/,
though it just passed.
I think this RC is going down though. I see in cluster testing that
my fix for HBASE-3872 adds an ugly WARN to the master logs
(HBASE-4129). We should also get in Andrew's REST fixes.
Good stuff,
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Eric Charles <er...@u-mangate.com>.
On 23/07/11 01:04, Stack wrote:
>> > Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
>> >
> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
> previous build (Eric Charles?)
There were 2 java processes left-over from a previous timed-out Test.
I didn't have the reflex to look for open ports.
Could have been a MiniHBaseCluster also with master and region servers.
Btw, running 'mvn test' on 0.90.4 release candidate gives here 1 failure:
testWritesWhileGetting(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion)
Time elapsed: 0.19 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<\x00\x00\x00<> but
was:<\x00\x00\x00:>
Thx.
--
Eric Charles
http://about.echarles.net
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Our build box is set to use 'ubuntu2'. IIRC, the wiki for
jenkins/hudson says its a single box but I've learned that the wiki is
stale after my recent interaction with infrastructure around ulimits.
It could be more than one machine. We just hit a successful build
and its the head of the branch, where I built 0.90.4 from so we're not
too bad off.
St.Ack
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not sure if all timeouts were due to hanging zk.
>
> 0.90 build 238 started at Jul 21, 2011 12:16:20
> AM<https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/238/>and
> failed
>
> But TRUNK build 2045, starting at Jul 21, 2011 1:34:20
> AM<https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK/2045/>,
> succeeded.
>
> Or maybe there were built on different boxes.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good. Make an issue Ted? Should at least probe for existing
>> zk ensemble (I used to have access to this build box but no longer)
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
>> previous
>> > build
>> > Looks like we should detect (and terminate, if possible) the hanging zk
>> from
>> > previous build as the first step in current build.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
>> >> >
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I ran tests locally multiple times. Seems fine.
>> >>
>> >> > Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
>> >> previous build (Eric Charles?)
>> >>
>> >> St.Ack
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I am not sure if all timeouts were due to hanging zk.
0.90 build 238 started at Jul 21, 2011 12:16:20
AM<https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/238/>and
failed
But TRUNK build 2045, starting at Jul 21, 2011 1:34:20
AM<https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-TRUNK/2045/>,
succeeded.
Or maybe there were built on different boxes.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> Sounds good. Make an issue Ted? Should at least probe for existing
> zk ensemble (I used to have access to this build box but no longer)
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
> previous
> > build
> > Looks like we should detect (and terminate, if possible) the hanging zk
> from
> > previous build as the first step in current build.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
> >> >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
> >> >
> >>
> >> I ran tests locally multiple times. Seems fine.
> >>
> >> > Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
> >> previous build (Eric Charles?)
> >>
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >
>
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Sounds good. Make an issue Ted? Should at least probe for existing
zk ensemble (I used to have access to this build box but no longer)
St.Ack
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from previous
> build
> Looks like we should detect (and terminate, if possible) the hanging zk from
> previous build as the first step in current build.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
>> >
>>
>> I ran tests locally multiple times. Seems fine.
>>
>> > Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
>> >
>>
>> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
>> previous build (Eric Charles?)
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
>> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from previous
build
Looks like we should detect (and terminate, if possible) the hanging zk from
previous build as the first step in current build.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
> >
>
> I ran tests locally multiple times. Seems fine.
>
> > Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
> >
>
> It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
> previous build (Eric Charles?)
>
> St.Ack
>
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
>
I ran tests locally multiple times. Seems fine.
> Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
>
It was speculated that this was because a zk was left over from
previous build (Eric Charles?)
St.Ack
Re: ANN: The first 0.90.4 release candidate, 0.90.4RC0, is available
for download
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
The latest 0.90 build on builds.apache.org wasn't successful:
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/hbase-0.90/239/console
Shall we investigate why TestShell hung ?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> The first hbase 0.90.4 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.4-candidate-0/
>
> Release notes are available here, [1]. ~sixty issues have been
> resolved since 0.90.3
>
> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.90.4?
>
> Please vote +1/-1 by next Friday, July 29th.
>
> Yours,
> The HBasers
>
> 1.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12316406
>