You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to muse-user@ws.apache.org by le...@bt.com on 2007/02/12 17:22:03 UTC
wsdl2Java -proxy
Hello all
After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:
Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.
Quick overview:
I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element
These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.
Am I missing the bigger picture or?
/Lenni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
Posted by le...@bt.com.
Thanks for the fast fix, and I must say I enjoy to look and feel of the
proxy files now compared to the older version, so much easier to get an
overview of my own implementation.
/Lenni
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach [mailto:aeberbac@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 12 February 2007 21:42
To: muse-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
Hi,
Yup, you caught a bug. I rewrote the proxy code but failed to replicate
some of the nuances of the existing proxy code. I've fixed it and
committed it in. It should be in tonight's build.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 12:15 PM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
I've sent an email to you with the attached files as I didn't want to
fill up the members email boxes, but it's based on the wsdl-template
from the muse website with all the WSN and WSDM parts removed
/Lenni
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach [mailto:aeberbac@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 12 February 2007 16:28
To: muse-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: wsdl2Java -proxy
Hi,
Can you provide more details on the wsdl you are using? This code did
change recently.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 11:22 AM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
wsdl2Java -proxy
Hello all
After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:
Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.
Quick overview:
I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element
These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.
Am I missing the bigger picture or?
/Lenni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
Posted by Andrew Eberbach <ae...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi,
Yup, you caught a bug. I rewrote the proxy code but failed to replicate
some of the nuances of the existing proxy code. I've fixed it and
committed it in. It should be in tonight's build.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 12:15 PM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
I've sent an email to you with the attached files as I didn't want to
fill up the members email boxes, but it's based on the wsdl-template
from the muse website with all the WSN and WSDM parts removed
/Lenni
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach [mailto:aeberbac@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 12 February 2007 16:28
To: muse-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: wsdl2Java -proxy
Hi,
Can you provide more details on the wsdl you are using? This code did
change recently.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 11:22 AM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
wsdl2Java -proxy
Hello all
After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:
Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.
Quick overview:
I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element
These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.
Am I missing the bigger picture or?
/Lenni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
RE: wsdl2Java -proxy
Posted by le...@bt.com.
I've sent an email to you with the attached files as I didn't want to
fill up the members email boxes, but it's based on the wsdl-template
from the muse website with all the WSN and WSDM parts removed
/Lenni
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Eberbach [mailto:aeberbac@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 12 February 2007 16:28
To: muse-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: wsdl2Java -proxy
Hi,
Can you provide more details on the wsdl you are using? This code did
change recently.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 11:22 AM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
wsdl2Java -proxy
Hello all
After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:
Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.
Quick overview:
I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element
These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.
Am I missing the bigger picture or?
/Lenni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
Re: wsdl2Java -proxy
Posted by Andrew Eberbach <ae...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi,
Can you provide more details on the wsdl you are using? This code did
change recently.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Eberbach
Autonomic Computing
(919) 254-2645
T/L: 444-2645
aeberbac@us.ibm.com
<le...@bt.com>
02/12/2007 11:22 AM
Please respond to
muse-user@ws.apache.org
To
<mu...@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
wsdl2Java -proxy
Hello all
After running into a couple of problems with my deployed services when
using the wsdl2java proxy flag (and doing a bit of back tracing to when
I last had a functional proxy), I'm ending up with one question:
Did something change in the proxy generation from nightly build
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin to muse-2.2.0-2007-02-02-02-00-bin? I've
chosen these two builds due to the fact that I can get a correct proxy
in the first one but a flawed one in the second (and even with the
newest downloaded today), please note that the server side code seems to
be correctly generated.
Quick overview:
I've 2 capabilities I need to call:
1) Takes 2 strings and returns an EPR
2) Takes 1 string and returns en Element
These two capabilities get a proxy in the
muse-2.2.0-2007-01-19-02-00-bin but in the newer version nothing is
generated for these two.
Am I missing the bigger picture or?
/Lenni
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: muse-user-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: muse-user-help@ws.apache.org