You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/12 08:18:11 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32653] - Beans and Maps mixed up in PropertyUtils.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32653>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32653





------- Additional Comments From dakota.jack@gmail.com  2004-12-12 08:18 -------
The central point is that a single bean ought to be able to retrieve and to
supply data from the request/response http exchanges.  The present beanutils
architecture  makes that to a large extent difficult by making certain sorts of
objects incapable of being retrieval objects, e.g. Map objects.  A utilities
program ought not to enforce this sort of architectural restriction on the
applications it services.  I would provisionally suggest that the use of
property utils by bean utils be split in its behavior depending upon whether or
not the action is one of population (retrieval) versus one of creating the
response (supplying data).

Jack

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org