[OT - votes] Re: again, another 10.3.1. release candidate?

[Stanley Bradbury <St...@gmail.com>]

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Stanley Bradbury wrote:
>
>> As I indicated with my [-1] vote to the 10.3.1.2 VOTE thread: I need 
>> the fix for Derby-2896 to be part of official 10.3 release - this 
>> requires that new release candidtate be created (presumably 10.3.1.3?)
>
> Just a gentle reminder, no-one can veto a release. Thus anyone's 
> desires for a specific bug to be fixed do not impose any requirement 
> on a release manager. It is ok for a release to proceed "ignoring" -1 
> votes as long as it has the required number of +1 PMC votes.
>
> Though, I think if a release does have -1 votes that it is wise for 
> the release manager to consider them before putting the release on the 
> mirrors.
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
Of course.  I mentioned my vote and stated the importance (to me) of  
having this fix in the context of this thread asking "..another release 
candidate?", nothing more implied.