You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org> on 2020/03/10 11:46:25 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Since there was no-one that said we should keep the windows scripts and
no-one responded on the user ML thread I'll close the Jira issues/PRs
about extending the scripts.
Aljoscha
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
Thank you for your opinions. I filed a ticket for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16683
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:34 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for removing them.
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:06 AM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 on removing them.
> >
> > They are so limited in terms of functionality that I doubt anyone would
> > be significantly impaired by us removing them.
> >
> > On 11/03/2020 02:13, Xintong Song wrote:
> > > Thanks for the survey, Aljoscha. I'll also close FLINK-15925.
> > >
> > > I second Robert's concern. It sounds a bit weird that we keep something
> > in
> > > our project that does not work and is not maintained. Might also cause
> > > confusions for future new comers who may not be aware of our conclusion
> > > today. Maybe we should remove them? Like what we do for other legacy
> > codes.
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:01 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 10.03.20 14:35, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > >>> I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat
> files
> > >> in
> > >>> bin/ ?
> > >> We can leave them there because they're not doing much harm, and
> > >> removing them might actively break some existing setup.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Aljoscha
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
+1 for removing them.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:06 AM Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 on removing them.
>
> They are so limited in terms of functionality that I doubt anyone would
> be significantly impaired by us removing them.
>
> On 11/03/2020 02:13, Xintong Song wrote:
> > Thanks for the survey, Aljoscha. I'll also close FLINK-15925.
> >
> > I second Robert's concern. It sounds a bit weird that we keep something
> in
> > our project that does not work and is not maintained. Might also cause
> > confusions for future new comers who may not be aware of our conclusion
> > today. Maybe we should remove them? Like what we do for other legacy
> codes.
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:01 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 10.03.20 14:35, Robert Metzger wrote:
> >>> I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files
> >> in
> >>> bin/ ?
> >> We can leave them there because they're not doing much harm, and
> >> removing them might actively break some existing setup.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Aljoscha
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>.
+1 on removing them.
They are so limited in terms of functionality that I doubt anyone would
be significantly impaired by us removing them.
On 11/03/2020 02:13, Xintong Song wrote:
> Thanks for the survey, Aljoscha. I'll also close FLINK-15925.
>
> I second Robert's concern. It sounds a bit weird that we keep something in
> our project that does not work and is not maintained. Might also cause
> confusions for future new comers who may not be aware of our conclusion
> today. Maybe we should remove them? Like what we do for other legacy codes.
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:01 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10.03.20 14:35, Robert Metzger wrote:
>>> I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files
>> in
>>> bin/ ?
>> We can leave them there because they're not doing much harm, and
>> removing them might actively break some existing setup.
>>
>> Best,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the survey, Aljoscha. I'll also close FLINK-15925.
I second Robert's concern. It sounds a bit weird that we keep something in
our project that does not work and is not maintained. Might also cause
confusions for future new comers who may not be aware of our conclusion
today. Maybe we should remove them? Like what we do for other legacy codes.
Thank you~
Xintong Song
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:01 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On 10.03.20 14:35, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files
> in
> > bin/ ?
>
> We can leave them there because they're not doing much harm, and
> removing them might actively break some existing setup.
>
> Best,
> Aljoscha
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>.
On 10.03.20 14:35, Robert Metzger wrote:
> I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files in
> bin/ ?
We can leave them there because they're not doing much harm, and
removing them might actively break some existing setup.
Best,
Aljoscha
Re: [DISCUSS] Extend (or maintain) "shell" script support for Windows
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
I'm wondering whether we should file a ticket to remove the *.bat files in
bin/ ?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:46 PM Aljoscha Krettek <al...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Since there was no-one that said we should keep the windows scripts and
> no-one responded on the user ML thread I'll close the Jira issues/PRs
> about extending the scripts.
>
> Aljoscha
>