You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Stuart McCulloch <mc...@apache.org> on 2008/01/03 16:14:37 UTC
[Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Hi folks,
I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project.
This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was
originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so
that
the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes without introducing a circular
dependency in Maven.
I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
directory.
(this is the first time I've attempted to sign a release, so bear with me!)
Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
Cheers, Stuart
--
Stuart McCulloch
mcculls@apache.org
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Didier Donsez <di...@imag.fr>.
+1
Didier
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Saturday 05 January 2008 19:15, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> +1
+1
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <mc...@apache.org>.
On 03/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project.
>
> This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and
> was
> originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so
> that
> the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes without introducing a
> circular
> dependency in Maven.
>
> I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/>
>
> You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
> directory.
> (this is the first time I've attempted to sign a release, so bear with
> me!)
>
> Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
> --
> Stuart McCulloch
> mcculls@apache.org
>
+1 :)
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Here is my +1.
Thanks for adding the sources.
Regards
Felix
Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 23:14 +0800 schrieb Stuart McCulloch:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project.
>
> This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was
> originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so
> that
> the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes without introducing a circular
> dependency in Maven.
>
> I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
>
> You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
> directory.
> (this is the first time I've attempted to sign a release, so bear with me!)
>
> Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
Karl
On Jan 3, 2008 4:14 PM, Stuart McCulloch <mc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project.
>
> This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was
> originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so
> that
> the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes without introducing a circular
> dependency in Maven.
>
> I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
>
> You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
> directory.
> (this is the first time I've attempted to sign a release, so bear with me!)
>
> Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
> --
> Stuart McCulloch
> mcculls@apache.org
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/>
> >
> > ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
> > releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release
> > is
> > required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
>
>
> then the parent Felix pom seriously needs changing, as it doesn't attach
> either the source* or javadoc artifacts to the release - if you look at
> all the
> Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix
> _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts.
>
> (* the source is tagged in subversion as part of the release, but not
> packaged)
>
> so is it mandatory that source jars appear alongside on the Maven repo?
>
just to make clear, I prefer having the source jars attached: but having
looked at all the other releases from Felix just assumed the local policy
was to only upload the binary artifact...
Cheers
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >
> > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 4, 2008 4:01 AM, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
> On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
> >
> > ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
> > releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release is
> > required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
>
>
> then the parent Felix pom seriously needs changing, as it doesn't attach
> either the source* or javadoc artifacts to the release - if you look at all
> the
> Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix
> _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts.
>
> (* the source is tagged in subversion as part of the release, but not
> packaged)
>
> so is it mandatory that source jars appear alongside on the Maven repo?
Typically maven source jars don't include everything needed to build
the project and are just a nice-to-have (along with javadoc jar)
convenience for IDEs. Looking at your org.osgi.service.obr-1.0.0.zip
though that appears to be a copy of the tagged[1] svn repo so that IMO
is your source release and therefore satisfies ASF requirements.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/releases/org.osgi.service.obr-1.0.0/
Niall
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Friday 04 January 2008 20:55, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> though it would be nice to have source & javadoc on the Maven repo too
Yes, as a user, I like that too.
My fav;
mvn dependency:sources
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 January 2008 12:01, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix
> > _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts.
>
> This is not the release location. It is an external service provided
> by "someone else", not important to the ASF.
>
> Instead, the release will typically be (if approved), one src and one bin
> tarball/zip placed on people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/
> together with checksums and signatures. This location is part of the
> mirror
> and backup systems.
yep, my mistake - still learning where everything goes in apache-land
( though it would be nice to have source & javadoc on the Maven repo too ;)
Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Friday 04 January 2008 12:01, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix
> _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts.
This is not the release location. It is an external service provided
by "someone else", not important to the ASF.
Instead, the release will typically be (if approved), one src and one bin
tarball/zip placed on people.apache.org:/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/
together with checksums and signatures. This location is part of the mirror
and backup systems.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
>
> ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
> releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release is
> required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
then the parent Felix pom seriously needs changing, as it doesn't attach
either the source* or javadoc artifacts to the release - if you look at all
the
Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix
_none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts.
(* the source is tagged in subversion as part of the release, but not
packaged)
so is it mandatory that source jars appear alongside on the Maven repo?
Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>
> BTW, shouldn't http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi show the source
> downloads?
> When I view it with firefox I don't see any download links - but I
> eventually found them
> over at http://apache.leakage.org/felix
>
> (this is what originally confused me about whether the tagged release was
> enough)
>
Yes, I understand - it seems that our download page is broken now; it
used to work,
I'll have a look.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/>
> >
> > ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
> > releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release
> > is
> > required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
>
>
> I've uploaded signed tar.gz's and zip's of the source based on the tagged
> release
>
BTW, shouldn't http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi show the source
downloads?
When I view it with firefox I don't see any download links - but I
eventually found them
over at http://apache.leakage.org/felix
(this is what originally confused me about whether the tagged release was
enough)
Cheers
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >
> > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
>
> ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
> releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release is
> required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
I've uploaded signed tar.gz's and zip's of the source based on the tagged
release
Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary
releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release is
required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
Re: [Vote] release org.osgi.service.obr 1.0.0
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
+1
Stuart, the MD5 and SHA1 files for the JAR and the POM where generated
differently than the ones for the src tar.gz/zip files...the latter ones
work better for me, since md5sum and sha1sum can then verify the files
directly.
I think we should be able to close this vote shortly, which will be good
because we need this release to release maven bundle plugin 1.2.0, which
is necessary for us to release Felix 1.0.2.
Stuart, please start the maven bundle plugin release as soon as possible.
Thanks.
-> richard
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the release of the org.osgi.service.obrsub-project.
>
> This sub-project contains OBR classes provided by the OSGi Alliance and was
> originally part of the bundlerepository, but it has been separated out so
> that
> the maven-obr-plugin can also use the classes without introducing a circular
> dependency in Maven.
>
> I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/
>
> You can also find the KEYS file for verifying the signature in this
> directory.
> (this is the first time I've attempted to sign a release, so bear with me!)
>
> Please check the release and cast your votes! (vote will run for 72hrs)
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>