You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Gavin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/29 09:27:34 UTC

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (MESOS-5730) Sandbox access authorization should fail for non existing sandboxes.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gavin updated MESOS-5730:
-------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: www.rtat.net)

> Sandbox access authorization should fail for non existing sandboxes.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-5730
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5730
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Till Toenshoff
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: authorization, mesosphere, security
>
> The local authorizer currently tries to authorize {{ACCESS_SANDBOX}} even if no further object specification - e.g. {{framework_info}} or {{executor_info}}) where specified / available at that time.
> Given that there is likely no sandbox available if there was no {{executor_info}} provided, I think we should actually fail instead of allow or deny (403).
> A failure would result into an IMHO more appropriate ServiceUnavailable (503).  
> See https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/c8d67590064e35566274116cede9c6a733187b48#diff-dd692b1640b2628014feca01a94ba1e1R241



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)