[Possible SPAM] Re: [Possible SPAM] Re: hey

[Chris <cp...@embarqmail.com>]

On Saturday 05 May 2007 10:31 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
>         tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7]
>
> > Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured
> > setup,
> > note the [ALL_TRUSTED].
>
> Also note the Bayes_00.  If they have bayes trained to think spam is ham,
> they have a problem.
>
>         Loren

They definately do have one and I've been bugging them about it daily and only 
get the "we're working on the issue/we've escaulated the issue/and so forth". 
They must prepend the subject of every one of my messages automatically even 
if their SA doesn't score it as such:

Old-X-Spam-Score: -1.895
 Old-X-Spam-Level: 
 Old-X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6
        tests=[AWL=0.704, BAYES_00=-2.599]

-- 
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C