You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org> on 2007/01/29 15:32:36 UTC
mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
The mod_python 3.3.1 tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
the next couple of days.
There have been no changes in the code since the 3.3.0 beta. Indeed the
only thing that has changed is the version strings so we don't need
extensive testing this time around - just a few people to check that I
haven't done something stupid in creating the tarball. Once we have a
handful of +1's I'll call for a vote from the core committers.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
_this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
me personally).
The files are (temporarily) available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.md5
Please download it, then do the usual
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
Then (as non-root user!)
$ make check
Or for you Windows folks
$ cd test
$ python test.py
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
the test output, and suggestions, if any).
Please present your test results in the following format:
+1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
For example:
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
extract this information automatically. :)
Thank you for your assistance,
Jim Gallacher
Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu>.
+1 MacOSX 10.4.8 (Intel), Apache 2.0.59 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E FF 3B B9 7C 2C
Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Clodoaldo <cl...@gmail.com>.
2007/1/29, Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org>:
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
+1 Linux FC5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux FC6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
Regards,
--
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto
Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Jorey Bump <li...@joreybump.com>.
+1 Slackware Linux 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3.1 tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> There have been no changes in the code since the 3.3.0 beta. Indeed the
> only thing that has changed is the version strings so we don't need
> extensive testing this time around - just a few people to check that I
> haven't done something stupid in creating the tarball. Once we have a
> handful of +1's I'll call for a vote from the core committers.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
> me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
Fwd: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@lehuen.com>.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@lehuen.com>
Date: 1 févr. 2007 20:50
Subject: Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
To: Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org>
Hi,
I've built the 3.3.1 binaries for Windows, you can download it from :
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
Here are my +1s following the tests :
+1 Microsoft Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.59 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
+1 Microsoft Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.59 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
+1 Microsoft Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
+1 Microsoft Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
Once again, no tests for Python 2.3, sadly I need to have a dedicated
(or virtual) PC for this and I'm a bit out of time for now. If anyone
wants to have a go with Python 2.3, that would be great.
And now, time for a Pastis.
Regards,
Nicolas
2007/1/29, Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org>:
> The mod_python 3.3.1 tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> There have been no changes in the code since the 3.3.0 beta. Indeed the
> only thing that has changed is the version strings so we don't need
> extensive testing this time around - just a few people to check that I
> haven't done something stupid in creating the tarball. Once we have a
> handful of +1's I'll call for a vote from the core committers.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
> me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
I'd like to get a core vote on 3.3.1 before Graham goes on holidays. If
we can get 2 more people to check the tarball I think we can then
proceed with the vote and an official 3.3.1 stable release.
Jim
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Thanks Detmar.
>
> There was a typo in the original email. Oops. The md5 file is
> mod_python-3.3.1.tgz.md5.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz.md5
>
>
> Jim
>
> Detmar Meurers wrote:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> for the md5 file you mention, I get a '404 Not Found' error.
>>
>> Best,
>> Detmar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:32:36AM -0500, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>> The mod_python 3.3.1 tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
>> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for
>> testing in
>> the next couple of days.
>> There have been no changes in the code since the 3.3.0 beta.
>> Indeed the only thing that has changed is the version strings so
>> we don't need extensive testing this time around - just a few
>> people to check that I haven't done something stupid in creating
>> the tarball. Once we have a handful of +1's I'll call for a vote
>> from the core committers.
>> Here are the rules:
>> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be
>> tested by
>> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
>> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
>> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and
>> preferably not
>> me personally).
>> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.md5
>> Please download it, then do the usual
>> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
>> $ make
>> $ (su)
>> # make install
>> Then (as non-root user!)
>> $ make check
>> Or for you Windows folks
>> $ cd test
>> $ python test.py
>> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the
>> list, if they
>> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm,
>> Python,
>> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>> Please present your test results in the following format:
>> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>> For example:
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
>> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in
>> each
>> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
>> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
>> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a
>> script to
>> extract this information automatically. :)
>> Thank you for your assistance,
>> Jim Gallacher
>>
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.3.1 available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org>.
Thanks Detmar.
There was a typo in the original email. Oops. The md5 file is
mod_python-3.3.1.tgz.md5.
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz.md5
Jim
Detmar Meurers wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> for the md5 file you mention, I get a '404 Not Found' error.
>
> Best,
> Detmar
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:32:36AM -0500, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3.1 tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> There have been no changes in the code since the 3.3.0 beta. Indeed the
> only thing that has changed is the version strings so we don't need
> extensive testing this time around - just a few people to check that I
> haven't done something stupid in creating the tarball. Once we have a
> handful of +1's I'll call for a vote from the core committers.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
> me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.1.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>