You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Steve Blackmon <sb...@apache.org> on 2014/12/21 23:06:36 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on streams-dev.
VOTE:
http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
RESULT:
http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
Matthew Franklin: +1
Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
Source release:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Steve Blackmon
sblackmon@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to binary files in source release.
./runner/bundles/org.apache.felix.gogo.command_0.12.0.jar
./runner/bundles/org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime_0.10.0.jar
./runner/bundles/org.apache.felix.gogo.shell_0.10.0.jar
./runner/bundles/org.apache.felix.main_4.0.3.jar
But everything else looks good:
- hashes and MD5 fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- artefact has incubating in file name
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No other binary files in source release
- All source code has correct headers
- Can compile from source
I do get some tests failing but that may be due to my environment.
Things you might way to change for next release:
- Update year in NOTICE file
- Add "apache" to the artefact name
- Have both a tar.gz and .zip source release
Thanks,
Justin
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>.
On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 8:27:29 PM Steve Blackmon <st...@blackmon.org> wrote:
> I've cancelled the 0.1-rc1 vote, and I'm working to get a rc2 ready that
> can pass.
>
> The issue Ate raised about the DISCLAIMER is valid, but what I'm seeing is
> very strange.
>
> The jar artifacts generated in the target directories of the modules during
> the release:prepare step all have DISCLAIMER files. The sources, javadoc,
> and test-jar archives often do, but not always.
>
> Every jar artifact generated underneath target/checkout during the
> release:perform step are missing DISCLAIMER files.
>
> The configuration of maven-source-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin,
> and maven-jar-plugin derive solely from the project root pom, and I'm using
> the apache-release profile during both release commands. So I'm confused
> as to why some modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER and some don't during
> prepare, and why no modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER during perform.
>
> If anyone has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. I'll keep messing with
> poms and crossing my fingers.
>
I thought maven assembly needed to add the disclaimer to non-source jars...
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Good points Ate. I apologize to the community for the incorrect +1 from
> my
> > vote. I missed the binary artifacts issues in the original vote, but
> they
> > are important things to get right.
> >
> > Everyone should keep in mind that this is a learning process and as these
> > items get resolved, it will make the next releases easier.
> > On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 3:56:30 AM Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> >
> > > FYI.
> > >
> > > Sorry about the late and negative vote, see below.
> > >
> > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
> > > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:52:28 +0100
> > > From: Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>
> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > > -1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I
> > > noticed:
> > > - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not
> > > contain the
> > > required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > >
> > > I also encountered build test failures.
> > >
> > > For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a
> > > basic
> > > "getting started" either online or with the source because for
> outsiders
> > > it is
> > > totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
> > >
> > > Regards, Ate
> > >
> > > For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote
> > > ran on
> > > the streams-dev list.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
> > > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the
> > > artifacts
> > > > being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
> > > >
> > > > We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we
> have
> > > > received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on
> > streams-dev.
> > > >
> > > > VOTE:
> > > > http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
> > > > RESULT:
> > > > http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
> > > >
> > > > IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
> > > > Matthew Franklin: +1
> > > >
> > > > Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.
> > > git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
> > > >
> > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
> > > >
> > > > Source release:
> > > > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-
> project/0.1-incubating/
> > > streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
> > > >
> > > > Vote open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Steve Blackmon
> > > > sblackmon@apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Steve Blackmon <st...@blackmon.org>.
I've cancelled the 0.1-rc1 vote, and I'm working to get a rc2 ready that
can pass.
The issue Ate raised about the DISCLAIMER is valid, but what I'm seeing is
very strange.
The jar artifacts generated in the target directories of the modules during
the release:prepare step all have DISCLAIMER files. The sources, javadoc,
and test-jar archives often do, but not always.
Every jar artifact generated underneath target/checkout during the
release:perform step are missing DISCLAIMER files.
The configuration of maven-source-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin,
and maven-jar-plugin derive solely from the project root pom, and I'm using
the apache-release profile during both release commands. So I'm confused
as to why some modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER and some don't during
prepare, and why no modules get packaged with a DISCLAIMER during perform.
If anyone has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. I'll keep messing with
poms and crossing my fingers.
Thanks,
Steve
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Good points Ate. I apologize to the community for the incorrect +1 from my
> vote. I missed the binary artifacts issues in the original vote, but they
> are important things to get right.
>
> Everyone should keep in mind that this is a learning process and as these
> items get resolved, it will make the next releases easier.
> On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 3:56:30 AM Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
>
> > FYI.
> >
> > Sorry about the late and negative vote, see below.
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
> > Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:52:28 +0100
> > From: Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > -1 (binding)
> >
> > Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I
> > noticed:
> > - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not
> > contain the
> > required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
> >
> > I also encountered build test failures.
> >
> > For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a
> > basic
> > "getting started" either online or with the source because for outsiders
> > it is
> > totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
> >
> > Regards, Ate
> >
> > For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote
> > ran on
> > the streams-dev list.
> >
> >
> > On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
> > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the
> > artifacts
> > > being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
> > >
> > > We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
> > > received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on
> streams-dev.
> > >
> > > VOTE:
> > > http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
> > > RESULT:
> > > http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
> > >
> > > IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
> > > Matthew Franklin: +1
> > >
> > > Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.
> > git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
> > >
> > > Source release:
> > > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/
> > streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
> > >
> > > Vote open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Steve Blackmon
> > > sblackmon@apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Matt Franklin <m....@gmail.com>.
Good points Ate. I apologize to the community for the incorrect +1 from my
vote. I missed the binary artifacts issues in the original vote, but they
are important things to get right.
Everyone should keep in mind that this is a learning process and as these
items get resolved, it will make the next releases easier.
On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 3:56:30 AM Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> FYI.
>
> Sorry about the late and negative vote, see below.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:52:28 +0100
> From: Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I
> noticed:
> - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not
> contain the
> required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
>
> I also encountered build test failures.
>
> For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a
> basic
> "getting started" either online or with the source because for outsiders
> it is
> totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
>
> Regards, Ate
>
> For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote
> ran on
> the streams-dev list.
>
>
> On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the
> artifacts
> > being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
> >
> > We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
> > received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on streams-dev.
> >
> > VOTE:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
> > RESULT:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
> >
> > IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
> > Matthew Franklin: +1
> >
> > Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.
> git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
> >
> > Source release:
> > http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/
> streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Steve Blackmon
> > sblackmon@apache.org
> >
>
>
>
>
Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
FYI.
Sorry about the late and negative vote, see below.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:52:28 +0100
From: Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
-1 (binding)
Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I noticed:
- binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain the
required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
I also encountered build test failures.
For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a basic
"getting started" either online or with the source because for outsiders it is
totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
Regards, Ate
For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote ran on
the streams-dev list.
On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts
> being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
>
> We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
> received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on streams-dev.
>
> VOTE:
> http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
> RESULT:
> http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
>
> IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
> Matthew Franklin: +1
>
> Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
>
> Source release:
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Steve Blackmon
> sblackmon@apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Could you send the [CANCEL] thread to officially kill this VOTE?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu> wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I
> noticed:
> - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain
> the required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
>
> I also encountered build test failures.
>
> For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a
> basic "getting started" either online or with the source because for
> outsiders it is totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
>
> Regards, Ate
>
> For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote ran
> on the streams-dev list.
>
>
> On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
>>
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts
>> being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
>>
>> We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
>> received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on streams-dev.
>>
>> VOTE:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
>> RESULT:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
>>
>> IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
>> Matthew Franklin: +1
>>
>> Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
>>
>> Source release:
>>
>> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Steve Blackmon
>> sblackmon@apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
-1 (binding)
Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I noticed:
- binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain the
required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files
I also encountered build test failures.
For the next release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a basic
"getting started" either online or with the source because for outsiders it is
totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
Regards, Ate
For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when this vote ran on
the streams-dev list.
On 2014-12-21 23:06, Steve Blackmon wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Streams, with the artifacts
> being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
>
> We are requesting at least two additional IPMC member votes, as we have
> received 1 binding IPMC +1 vote during the release voting on streams-dev.
>
> VOTE:
> http://markmail.org/thread/kbgr73ndhztwybsh
> RESULT:
> http://markmail.org/thread/fz53tiiqnadwyagg
>
> IPMC member votes from the streams-dev list:
> Matthew Franklin: +1
>
> Git tag streams-project-0.1-incubating-rc1 (commit 8e561d6)
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-streams.git;a=commit;h=8e561d60bae3fb74baad05ed5a0d1be6631ceab1
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000
>
> Source release:
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreams-1000/org/apache/streams/streams-project/0.1-incubating/streams-project-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sblackmon.asc
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Steve Blackmon
> sblackmon@apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org