You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> on 2008/03/03 09:27:04 UTC
Time for issues@ and commits@ lists?
Shindig-dev is a decidedly busy list. It would help me monitor the list
if we had commits and jira messages going to separate lists.
It would certainly be reasonable to set up shindig-commits and
shindig-issues lists.
Should we do this?
What do people think?
Upayavira
Re: Time for issues@ and commits@ lists?
Posted by Cassie <do...@apache.org>.
Kevin - subversion sorta integrates already. On each issue's page you can
see the list of commits from svn that have the SHINDIG-XX text in the
comment. This is how I usually remember which changes went in.
Upayavira -
+1
- Cassie
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Kevin Brown <et...@google.com> wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea. We probably don't want a shindig-users
> list
> quite yet, but separating commits from normal discussion would be a good
> idea I think.
>
> By the way -- any word on making SVN integrate with JIRA? It would be nice
> to be able to put SHINDIG-XXX in the commit messages and not have to
> remember revision numbers (and make typos in the process) when updating
> issues.
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Shindig-dev is a decidedly busy list. It would help me monitor the list
> > if we had commits and jira messages going to separate lists.
> >
> > It would certainly be reasonable to set up shindig-commits and
> > shindig-issues lists.
> >
> > Should we do this?
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > Upayavira
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Kevin
>
Re: Time for issues@ and commits@ lists?
Posted by Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>.
I think it would be a good idea. We probably don't want a shindig-users list
quite yet, but separating commits from normal discussion would be a good
idea I think.
By the way -- any word on making SVN integrate with JIRA? It would be nice
to be able to put SHINDIG-XXX in the commit messages and not have to
remember revision numbers (and make typos in the process) when updating
issues.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Shindig-dev is a decidedly busy list. It would help me monitor the list
> if we had commits and jira messages going to separate lists.
>
> It would certainly be reasonable to set up shindig-commits and
> shindig-issues lists.
>
> Should we do this?
>
> What do people think?
>
> Upayavira
>
>
>
--
~Kevin