You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/06/15 18:22:44 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] jedcunningham opened a new pull request #16465: Remove support jinja templated log_id in elasticsearch

jedcunningham opened a new pull request #16465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16465


   This simplifies the handling of log_id in elasticsearch remote logging.
   Support for a jinja templated log_id was never explicitly documented, and
   where it was included in examples it was actually broken.
   
   If someone fixed the broken jinja examples and used it, differing formats for
   execution_date may be problematic and updating documents in Elasticsearch
   may be required.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [airflow] github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16465: Remove support jinja templated log_id in elasticsearch

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16465#issuecomment-861800450


   The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org