You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/24 08:44:25 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (IGNITE-2876) IGFS: System pool starvation is possible during data block write.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Ozerov reassigned IGNITE-2876:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov  (was: Ivan Veselovsky)

> IGFS: System pool starvation is possible during data block write.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-2876
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2876
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: IGFS
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> *Problem*
> IGFS has a set of messages to exchange data and signal events between nodes. These are:
> - {{IgfsAckMessage}}
> - {{IgfsBlocksMessage}}
> - {{IgfsDeleteMessage}}
> - {{IgfsFragmentizerRequest}}
> - {{IgfsFragmentizerResponse}}
> Currently these messages are processed in a system pool which is wrong and may lead to starvation, deadlocks and incorrect behavior.
> Several examples:
> 1) {{IgfsBlocksMessage}} handling logic performs "Cache.putAsync" operation. This operation involves acquiring of semaphore permit. This semaphore, in turn, can only be released from another thread in the same system pool. As such, all system pool threads could hang on permit acquire forever.
> 2) In case file system size is exceeded, the same message waits for some time in hope that free space in cache will appear. However, if all system pool threads waits for this point, concurrent block removal cannot proceed, so these threads are doomed to receive {{IgfsOutOfSpaceException}} irrespective of whether they wait or not.
> *Solution*
> 1) Introduce new IO policy for IGFS (see {{GridIoPolicy}}). 
> 2) Force all IGFS message to be processed with this policy. No backward compatibility is needed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)