You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@flex.apache.org by "jan.weber" <Ja...@dallmeier.com> on 2021/05/03 09:31:34 UTC
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Actually, I can not find anything which does *not *work in IntelliJ regarding
Flex development.
IntelliJ is far superior in every aspect and I somehow would assume that you
have configured/set something in an incorrect way. Please elaborate on what
errors you have experienced.
-----
Jan F. Weber,
AIR/Flex Developer @ SeMSy 5 Front-End Team, Dallmeier electronic (www.dallmeier.com)
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by "Paulus de B." <w....@knollenstein.com>.
We've been using IntelliJ for a couple of years now for Flex/AIR Windows/Mac
app development in a very large project without any real issues. I did have
to up the heap because of the size of the project, but for rest runs fine.
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by Tucsonjhall <Jh...@cactusware.com>.
Well, I'm sure the complexity of the project has a bearing on the outcome.
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by After24 <vi...@after24.net>.
Hi,
Intellij IDEA works perfectly for us and is way more stable than Flash
Builder was (our applications contains thousands of mxlm views and .as
classes)
Vincent.
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by hn...@vservu.de.
I only have about 60 views, and for more than 2 years had no issues with
intelliJ at all!
The ones I had before could be quickly solved by the (very reactive)
support team.
And more than 50% of the cases had been a problem/misunderstanding on my
side!
It's a very reliable, comprehensive IDE and a big help!
I'm still on Flex because I use it with AIR and AS3 as desktop APP for
Windows and macOS.
I considered moving to Visual Studio Code (making use of Josh Tynjal's
extension for ActionScript and Mxml). Also because of HTM and Royale in
mind.
But besides some tests I never did any serious work with other IDEs. I
did not see the need and eventually gave up that idea.
For HTML, after FLASH was killed, I'm using pure JS at the moment, and
play with Vue. But did not make any decision when to leave the Flex way.
Am 03.05.2021 um 16:45 schrieb Blake McBride:
> I have a large system with 450 Flex screens (mostly re-written in HTML
> now). Perhaps IntelliJ works in simple cases. It certainly doesn't in
> more complex cases. I basically stopped developing in Flex over a year
> ago. Although I don't remember the exact issues, I do have access to my
> IntelliJ support log. Keep in mind that after they told me they don't
> support Flex anymore, I stopped reporting problems - but there were many
> more. I will post some of the problems when I have time.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:08 AM Tucsonjhall <Jh...@cactusware.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been using it since it was suggested here and I'm very happy with it.
>> I've never had a problem and it allows for very streamline packaging of
>> captive runtime. Sorry you had a bad experience. It's definitely my go-to
>> program now.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
>>
--
_________________________________________________________
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by Blake McBride <bl...@gmail.com>.
I have a large system with 450 Flex screens (mostly re-written in HTML
now). Perhaps IntelliJ works in simple cases. It certainly doesn't in
more complex cases. I basically stopped developing in Flex over a year
ago. Although I don't remember the exact issues, I do have access to my
IntelliJ support log. Keep in mind that after they told me they don't
support Flex anymore, I stopped reporting problems - but there were many
more. I will post some of the problems when I have time.
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 9:08 AM Tucsonjhall <Jh...@cactusware.com> wrote:
> I've been using it since it was suggested here and I'm very happy with it.
> I've never had a problem and it allows for very streamline packaging of
> captive runtime. Sorry you had a bad experience. It's definitely my go-to
> program now.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/
>
Re: Flashbuilder 4.7 for Mac
Posted by Tucsonjhall <Jh...@cactusware.com>.
I've been using it since it was suggested here and I'm very happy with it.
I've never had a problem and it allows for very streamline packaging of
captive runtime. Sorry you had a bad experience. It's definitely my go-to
program now.
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/