You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/09 23:52:03 UTC
Decisions decisions decisions -- single, list, set...?
Hi,
We have this on the docket for GA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-612
I was going through and dealing with it, but then was like -- "hmm… sorta like set."
What do people think? single/multi only?
Thanks,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
Re: [TinkerPop] Decisions decisions decisions -- single, list, set...?
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hi everyone,
Keep the input coming. If its not too much of a bother, it would be great if your replies were comments on the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-612?jql=project%20%3D%20TINKERPOP3%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open
Thank you,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll just add what I think I added in the dev list, if we keep SET we should change Features to be specific about SET and LIST support with tests. Right now we are lacking there.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Luca Garulli <l....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'd like having the chance to declare it as set. In case the vendor supports it natively it's a nice feature to have. Otherwise it could be simulated against lists with a disclaimer on performance impacts.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Lvc@
>
> Il 10/Apr/2015 02:46, "Daniel Kuppitz" <me...@gremlin.guru> ha scritto:
> It's not used in any of the samples in the docs. IMO that shows how unimportant it is. single/multi only should work for all use-cases. A bit of custom application logic and you can have a set-behavior.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have this on the docket for GA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-612
>
> I was going through and dealing with it, but then was like -- "hmm… sorta like set."
>
> What do people think? single/multi only?
>
> Thanks,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gremlin-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gremlin-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/37A5493C-D1DC-46D9-8E20-607E6F4B41A5%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gremlin-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gremlin-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CA%2Bf9seXdOjJPmGyPzxHyDEG-YbBwbc_A%3D2HijxLJe6eFRFZw_w%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gremlin-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gremlin-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CAGud20-krGgdChcRSEAJF97Em5F61XYDamD1zgFFOU3yN81cgg%40mail.gmail.com.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gremlin-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gremlin-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CAA-H43_KcimAS6mWyBovJ8sQud1SvzMwsSwTLU0T91PW_xSdUg%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.