Re: Why Vector ?

[Colin Chalmers <co...@maxware.nl>]

Needless to say you're not the first to make this comment, which is totally
correct.

However the present Turbine code was written at a time when there was
nothing other than Vector's. There are plans to update this but *someone*
has to do it. Priority is being given elsewhere.

Hope this clarifies things.

/colin


----- Original Message -----
From: "Unico Hommes" <Un...@hippo.nl>
To: <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Why Vector ?


> Greetings,
>
> I read that the Vector class is actually not the most efficient Collection
> class to use. Noticing their ubiquitous use in Turbine I wondered how
> relevant it is to consider this in the context of their use in Turbine ?
> Wouldn't Lists or Maps have been a better choice ?
>
> Regards,
> U.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-user-help@jakarta.apache.org