Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[John Thomas <jo...@astronomer.io.INVALID>]

Hi All,

Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a look and
let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the blog
published asap :)

View the draft here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/

Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and to
everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!

Regards,
John

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Leah Cole <co...@google.com.INVALID>]

Amazing work Ewa and John, thank you!

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:26 PM Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just want to say amazing work, and great content! Very helpful in
> understanding where Airflow is, and what could be in its future!
>
> Howard
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:55 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks John, Ewa,
>>
>> From what I saw it's an amazing job and (and I really like what I saw in
>> the survey). Also I think it is fantastic to engage the community in
>> preparation of the draft. I have a feeling that just commenting on the
>> survey report draft and discussing it was far more valuable than just
>> looking at the results alone!
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:23 PM Ewa Tatarczak
>> <ew...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks 👋
>>>
>>> Thank you so much for your feedback to the airflow survey's initial
>>> writeup! I addressed most of your suggestions and kept only "discussion
>>> type" comments in our document.
>>> Don't hesitate to add more thoughts though.
>>>
>>> I think we are closer and closer to the publishing date!
>>>
>>> Have a great day!
>>> Ewa
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:59 PM John Thomas
>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds good! I also plan on doing a few follow-up blogs looking at
>>>> specific questions and comparisons from previous years that would be worth
>>>> a deeper look.
>>>>
>>>> - J
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as
>>>>> we have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tomek
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
>>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Tomek
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs
>>>>>> we defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>>>>>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>>>>>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>>>>>> data link
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks John!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if
>>>>>>> that's not too much for a blog post.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've left few comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Tomek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>>>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>>>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>>>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> View the draft here:
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs,
>>>>>>>> and to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ewa Tatarczak
>>> User Experience Researcher
>>> ewatatarczak@google.com
>>>
>>>

-- 

Leah Cole (she/her) | Developer Programs Engineer, Data Analytics |
coleleah@google.com | +1 (925) 257-2112
*My working hours may not be your working hours. Please ping me anytime if
you'd like a status update on anything we are working on together - my goal
is to never be a blocker for you. *

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Howard Yoo <ho...@gmail.com>]

Just want to say amazing work, and great content! Very helpful in
understanding where Airflow is, and what could be in its future!

Howard

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:55 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> Thanks John, Ewa,
>
> From what I saw it's an amazing job and (and I really like what I saw in
> the survey). Also I think it is fantastic to engage the community in
> preparation of the draft. I have a feeling that just commenting on the
> survey report draft and discussing it was far more valuable than just
> looking at the results alone!
>
> J.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:23 PM Ewa Tatarczak
> <ew...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hey folks 👋
>>
>> Thank you so much for your feedback to the airflow survey's initial
>> writeup! I addressed most of your suggestions and kept only "discussion
>> type" comments in our document.
>> Don't hesitate to add more thoughts though.
>>
>> I think we are closer and closer to the publishing date!
>>
>> Have a great day!
>> Ewa
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:59 PM John Thomas
>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good! I also plan on doing a few follow-up blogs looking at
>>> specific questions and comparisons from previous years that would be worth
>>> a deeper look.
>>>
>>> - J
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as
>>>> we have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>>>>
>>>> Tomek
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tomek
>>>>>
>>>>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
>>>>> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>>>>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>>>>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>>>>> data link
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks John!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if
>>>>>> that's not too much for a blog post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've left few comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Tomek
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> View the draft here:
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs,
>>>>>>> and to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Ewa Tatarczak
>> User Experience Researcher
>> ewatatarczak@google.com
>>
>>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>]

Thanks John, Ewa,

From what I saw it's an amazing job and (and I really like what I saw in
the survey). Also I think it is fantastic to engage the community in
preparation of the draft. I have a feeling that just commenting on the
survey report draft and discussing it was far more valuable than just
looking at the results alone!

J.


On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:23 PM Ewa Tatarczak
<ew...@google.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hey folks 👋
>
> Thank you so much for your feedback to the airflow survey's initial
> writeup! I addressed most of your suggestions and kept only "discussion
> type" comments in our document.
> Don't hesitate to add more thoughts though.
>
> I think we are closer and closer to the publishing date!
>
> Have a great day!
> Ewa
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:59 PM John Thomas
> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good! I also plan on doing a few follow-up blogs looking at
>> specific questions and comparisons from previous years that would be worth
>> a deeper look.
>>
>> - J
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as we
>>> have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>>>
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tomek
>>>>
>>>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
>>>> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>>>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>>>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>>>> data link
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks John!
>>>>>
>>>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's
>>>>> not too much for a blog post.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've left few comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Tomek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> View the draft here:
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs,
>>>>>> and to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Ewa Tatarczak
> User Experience Researcher
> ewatatarczak@google.com
>
>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Ewa Tatarczak <ew...@google.com.INVALID>]

Hey folks 👋

Thank you so much for your feedback to the airflow survey's initial
writeup! I addressed most of your suggestions and kept only "discussion
type" comments in our document.
Don't hesitate to add more thoughts though.

I think we are closer and closer to the publishing date!

Have a great day!
Ewa

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:59 PM John Thomas
<jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:

> Sounds good! I also plan on doing a few follow-up blogs looking at
> specific questions and comparisons from previous years that would be worth
> a deeper look.
>
> - J
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as we
>> have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>>
>> Tomek
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tomek
>>>
>>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
>>> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>>> data link
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks John!
>>>>
>>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's
>>>> not too much for a blog post.
>>>>
>>>> I've left few comments.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Tomek
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>>
>>>>> View the draft here:
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>>
>>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs,
>>>>> and to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 



Ewa Tatarczak
User Experience Researcher
ewatatarczak@google.com

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[John Thomas <jo...@astronomer.io.INVALID>]

Sounds good! I also plan on doing a few follow-up blogs looking at specific
questions and comparisons from previous years that would be worth a deeper
look.

- J

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:

> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as we
> have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>
> Tomek
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomek
>>
>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
>> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>> data link
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks John!
>>>
>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's
>>> not too much for a blog post.
>>>
>>> I've left few comments.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>
>>>> View the draft here:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>
>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and
>>>> to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>]

Yep. Looks good.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:

> I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as we
> have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.
>
> Tomek
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas
> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomek
>>
>> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
>> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
>> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
>> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
>> data link
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks John!
>>>
>>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's
>>> not too much for a blog post.
>>>
>>> I've left few comments.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>>> blog published asap :)
>>>>
>>>> View the draft here:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>>
>>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and
>>>> to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>]

I think putting this to markdown can save some length. But as long as we
have tl;dr I'm ok with publishing what we have.

Tomek

On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 22:44, John Thomas <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi Tomek
>
> It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
> defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
> much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
> initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
> data link
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks John!
>>
>> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's
>> not too much for a blog post.
>>
>> I've left few comments.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tomek
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
>> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a
>>> look and let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the
>>> blog published asap :)
>>>
>>> View the draft here:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>>
>>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and
>>> to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[John Thomas <jo...@astronomer.io.INVALID>]

Hi Tomek

It is definitely a bit much, but in the style of the previous blogs we
defaulted to a full presentation of the results. If you think it's a bit
much we can do a series of posts talking about each section, and have one
initial post covering the TL;DR, an expanded executive summary, and the raw
data link

Regards,
John

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks John!
>
> I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's not
> too much for a blog post.
>
> I've left few comments.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomek
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas
> <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a look and
>> let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the blog
>> published asap :)
>>
>> View the draft here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>>
>> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and
>> to everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>>

Re: Airflow Survey Writeup Draft

[Tomasz Urbaszek <tu...@apache.org>]

Thanks John!

I really love the TL;DR! The doc has 31 pages, I'm wondering if that's not
too much for a blog post.

I've left few comments.

Cheers,
Tomek


On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 21:57, John Thomas <jo...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Here's the draft of the airflow survey's initial writeup! Take a look and
> let me know what you think, leave any edits, and we'll get the blog
> published asap :)
>
> View the draft here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18E3gBbrPI6cHAKRkRIPfju9pOk4EJNd2M-1fRJO4glA/
>
> Massive thanks to Ewa Tatarczak for drafting and generating graphs, and to
> everyone who helped get the word out during the Summit and beyond!
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>