You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ibatis.apache.org by Peter Andrews <pe...@Dartmouth.EDU> on 2006/11/16 00:07:21 UTC
Useful case where resultMap should not require any result elements
I have run into a case where I have an inherited class which has no
additional members than what are already in the superclass. I have made
some resultMaps, including one for the superclass. For the subclass I
also created a resultMap that extends the superclass' resultMap. However
-- there are no resultProperties that I wish to set since there are no
member variables in the subclass.
I think the DTD for resultMap should be changed from result+ to result*
to accomodate this case.
Thanks,
Peter Andrews
--
Peter Andrews
Software Engineer
Dartmouth Medical School
Computational Genetics
Rubin 707
(603) 653-3598
Peter.Andrews@dartmouth.edu
Re: Useful case where resultMap should not require any result elements
Posted by Tom Duffey <td...@utilivisor.com>.
+1 !!
On Nov 15, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Peter Andrews wrote:
> I have run into a case where I have an inherited class which has no
> additional members than what are already in the superclass. I have
> made some resultMaps, including one for the superclass. For the
> subclass I also created a resultMap that extends the superclass'
> resultMap. However -- there are no resultProperties that I wish to
> set since there are no member variables in the subclass.
>
> I think the DTD for resultMap should be changed from result+ to
> result* to accomodate this case.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter Andrews
>
> --
> Peter Andrews
> Software Engineer
> Dartmouth Medical School
> Computational Genetics
> Rubin 707
> (603) 653-3598
> Peter.Andrews@dartmouth.edu
>
Re: Useful case where resultMap should not require any result elements
Posted by Jeff Butler <je...@gmail.com>.
FYI...This is implemented in iBATIS 2.3.
Jeff Butler
On 11/15/06, Peter Andrews <pe...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> I have run into a case where I have an inherited class which has no
> additional members than what are already in the superclass. I have made
> some resultMaps, including one for the superclass. For the subclass I
> also created a resultMap that extends the superclass' resultMap. However
> -- there are no resultProperties that I wish to set since there are no
> member variables in the subclass.
>
> I think the DTD for resultMap should be changed from result+ to result*
> to accomodate this case.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter Andrews
>
> --
> Peter Andrews
> Software Engineer
> Dartmouth Medical School
> Computational Genetics
> Rubin 707
> (603) 653-3598
> Peter.Andrews@dartmouth.edu
>
>