T5 AJAX

[Pablo Ruggia <pr...@gmail.com>]

Hi !
I have a doubt, i'm wandering why T5 Ajax will be prototype/scriptaculous
based and stop being dojo based ?
Thanks !

Re: T5 AJAX

[janjonge <ja...@gmail.com>]

I keep asking myself the same question too. Why should there always be a
fresh start?

Jan

Pablo Ruggia wrote:
> 
> Hi !
> I have a doubt, i'm wandering why T5 Ajax will be prototype/scriptaculous
> based and stop being dojo based ?
> Thanks !
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5-AJAX-tf3607230.html#a10218069
Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: T5 AJAX

[David Avenante <d....@gmail.com>]

I took a glance at some ajax framework.

For the moment my preference go to ext :
http://extjs.com/download/build

I like this framework because for some reasons :
 1 - You can choose your core library (Yahoo
UI!<http://developer.yahoo.com/yui>,
jQuery or
<http://jquery.com/>
Prototype/Scriptaculous <http://prototypejs.org/>)

 2 - The quality of widgets is very impressive.

 3 - With JQuery and prototype you can use the rich existing plugins library

JQuery ans Prototype use fluent interface style (a la JMock) and it's very
easy and clean to use.

For Dojo, after take a glance i founded many functionality but not very
clean.
For exemple the menu is very much rich in functionality in Ext than in Dojo.

Thank's.


On 4/26/07, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That may vary; we may wrap jMaki instead.  Dojo is powerful, but
> Prototype/Scriptaculous is much simpler to take in and better documented.
> There's room for both, but I'm interested in what can provide the biggest
> bang for the buck.
>
> On 4/19/07, Pablo Ruggia <pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi !
> > I have a doubt, i'm wandering why T5 Ajax will be
> prototype/scriptaculous
> > based and stop being dojo based ?
> > Thanks !
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> TWD Consulting, Inc.
> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
> Creator, Apache HiveMind
>
> Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
>

Re: T5 AJAX

[Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>]

That may vary; we may wrap jMaki instead.  Dojo is powerful, but
Prototype/Scriptaculous is much simpler to take in and better documented.
There's room for both, but I'm interested in what can provide the biggest
bang for the buck.

On 4/19/07, Pablo Ruggia <pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi !
> I have a doubt, i'm wandering why T5 Ajax will be prototype/scriptaculous
> based and stop being dojo based ?
> Thanks !
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com