You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> on 2010/12/28 22:36:31 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1053461 - /subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
> New Revision: 1053461
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053461&view=rev
> Log:
> First hack at a DOAP file for Subversion, as requested by the Powers That Be
> at the ASF. (But I think it's a Good Thing, too. ;)
>
> This was autogenerated by http://projects.apache.org/create.html
>
> * publish/doap.rdf:
> New.
>
> Added:
> subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (with props)
>
> Added: subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf?rev=1053461&view=auto
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (added)
> +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +<?xml version="1.0"?>
> +<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"?>
> +<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en"
> + xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"
> + xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> + xmlns:asfext="http://projects.apache.org/ns/asfext#"
> + xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
> +<!--
> + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
> + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
> + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
> + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
> + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
> + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
> +
> + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> +
> + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
> + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
> + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
> + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
> + limitations under the License.
> +-->
> + <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/">
> + <created>2010-12-28</created>
> + <license rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/doap/licenses/asl20" />
> + <name>Apache Subversion</name>
> + <homepage rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/" />
> + <asfext:pmc rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org" />
> + <shortdesc>Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses</shortdesc>
> + <description>Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.</description>
> + <bug-database rdf:resource="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/" />
Couldn't we just use this URL for bug-database?
http://subversion.apache.org/issue-tracker.html
> + <mailing-list rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html" />
> + <download-page rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html" />
> + <programming-language>C</programming-language>
> + <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do
not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r1053461 - /subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>>> + <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
>>
>> They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do
>> not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
>
> From http://projects.apache.org/categories.html:
> build-management Projects related to building/maintaining source code/websites.
>
> That seems to fit the Subversion bill pretty well. But if we'd like,
> we can include additional categories as well.
Based on the list of categories, I can see why you chose that one, but
I think we need to create a new category. Subversion is not a build
management tool and it does not make sense to lump it in with Maven,
Ant, Ivy etc.
I think version control is probably the best category, but if the goal
seems to be to find ways to group Apache projects together then maybe
we should add SCM? There are other Apache projects like Maven that
could fit in that category.
We could also add httpd-module as one of our categories. Technically
content and library would also probably be valid, but these are really
all secondary categories IMO.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r1053461 - /subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> New Revision: 1053461
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053461&view=rev
>> Log:
>> First hack at a DOAP file for Subversion, as requested by the Powers That Be
>> at the ASF. (But I think it's a Good Thing, too. ;)
>>
>> This was autogenerated by http://projects.apache.org/create.html
>>
>> * publish/doap.rdf:
>> New.
>>
>> Added:
>> subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (with props)
>>
>> Added: subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf?rev=1053461&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (added)
>> +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +<?xml version="1.0"?>
>> +<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"?>
>> +<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en"
>> + xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"
>> + xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>> + xmlns:asfext="http://projects.apache.org/ns/asfext#"
>> + xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
>> +<!--
>> + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>> + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
>> + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>> + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>> + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>> + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> +
>> + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> +
>> + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>> + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>> + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>> + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>> + limitations under the License.
>> +-->
>> + <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/">
>> + <created>2010-12-28</created>
>> + <license rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/doap/licenses/asl20" />
>> + <name>Apache Subversion</name>
>> + <homepage rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/" />
>> + <asfext:pmc rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org" />
>> + <shortdesc>Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses</shortdesc>
>> + <description>Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.</description>
>> + <bug-database rdf:resource="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/" />
>
> Couldn't we just use this URL for bug-database?
> http://subversion.apache.org/issue-tracker.html
Sure could. :)
(I'll probably get around to that at some point, but if anybody else
wants to beat me to it, feel free.)
>
>
>> + <mailing-list rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html" />
>> + <download-page rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html" />
>> + <programming-language>C</programming-language>
>> + <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
>
> They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do
> not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
Re: svn commit: r1053461 - /subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> New Revision: 1053461
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053461&view=rev
>> Log:
>> First hack at a DOAP file for Subversion, as requested by the Powers That Be
>> at the ASF. (But I think it's a Good Thing, too. ;)
>>
>> This was autogenerated by http://projects.apache.org/create.html
>>
>> * publish/doap.rdf:
>> New.
>>
>> Added:
>> subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (with props)
>>
>> Added: subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf?rev=1053461&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (added)
>> +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +<?xml version="1.0"?>
>> +<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"?>
>> +<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en"
>> + xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"
>> + xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>> + xmlns:asfext="http://projects.apache.org/ns/asfext#"
>> + xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
>> +<!--
>> + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>> + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
>> + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>> + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>> + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>> + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> +
>> + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> +
>> + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>> + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>> + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>> + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>> + limitations under the License.
>> +-->
>> + <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/">
>> + <created>2010-12-28</created>
>> + <license rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/doap/licenses/asl20" />
>> + <name>Apache Subversion</name>
>> + <homepage rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/" />
>> + <asfext:pmc rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org" />
>> + <shortdesc>Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses</shortdesc>
>> + <description>Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.</description>
>> + <bug-database rdf:resource="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/" />
>
> Couldn't we just use this URL for bug-database?
> http://subversion.apache.org/issue-tracker.html
Sure could. :)
(I'll probably get around to that at some point, but if anybody else
wants to beat me to it, feel free.)
>
>
>> + <mailing-list rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html" />
>> + <download-page rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html" />
>> + <programming-language>C</programming-language>
>> + <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
>
> They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do
> not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
>From http://projects.apache.org/categories.html:
build-management Projects related to building/maintaining source code/websites.
That seems to fit the Subversion bill pretty well. But if we'd like,
we can include additional categories as well.
-Hyrum