You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2010/01/14 22:47:44 UTC
Interceptor API changes
Heads up on some spec jar changes...
I've started to run the various geronimo-foo_spec jars through the
Java EE 6 TCK to ensure the signatures are correct. Once of the
adjustments is that the javax.interceptor.Interceptor class no longer
is marked as @Stereotype (also not @Inherited and only useable at TYPE
level). I've updated it to be compliant and since it no longer has
any JCDI dependency I moved the two classes into the geronimo-
interceptor-1.1_spec module. The "geronimo-cdi_1.0_spec" module has
also been renamed to geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for consistency and the
'provided' dependency on the old javaee5 geronimo-interceptor module
has been upgraded to the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
So at some point we'll need to roll over to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec
and geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec modules.
-David
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
That sounds cool. Send me a pom and I'll push it up!
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> ohhh, kk that explains a lot ;)
>
> sorry, didn't catch that information.
>
> A way to make this clear just in case other projects also get
> confused (and do not have the maintainer on board) would be to
> publish the 1.0.9-SNAPSHOT pom with packaging 'pom' containing only
> the information that is still not final and people should use EA1
> instead. Basically the same like we did with javax.* artifacts for a
> long time.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
>> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 3:10 PM
>> Just a gentle reminder that
>> 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current
>> snapshot. The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever existed for 10
>> minutes when I
>> was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec module.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:13:53
>> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
>> 2 lines
>>
>> Adding "EA1" to version as this is still
>> technically Early Access
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:09:36
>> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
>> 2 lines
>>
>> Rolled version to 1.1
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:03:59
>> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
>> 2 lines
>>
>> Interceptor 1.1 API
>>
>>
>> We could switch it over to something that is not "EA" but
>> it would
>> still have to be a pre-final number. We won't be able
>> to release a
>> final "1.0" version number till it passes the final TCK
>> which we
>> haven't gotten yet.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>
>>> The code has already written, look
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
>>>
>>> But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
>>>
>>> --Gurkan
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>
>>>> I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding.
>> This class is not
>>>> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>>>>
>>>> Where did it got moved to?
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
>>>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
>>>>>>>> Do you know what the
>>>>> status is on the JCDI library with regards to
>> the
>>>>> TCK?
>>>>> I have been working with TCK and it seems that
>> there is no
>>>>> problem so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Gurkan
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan
>> Erdogdu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have looked,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> It is correct now.
>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are two versions of interceptor
>>>>> specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
>>>>>>> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>> is not.
>>>>> AFAIK, its version must be
>>>>>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1.
>> We use
>>>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't run the final TCK against this
>> library, just
>>>>> the TCK from
>>>>>> November, but it's probably safe to yank
>> the EA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know what the status is on the JCDI
>> library
>>>>> with regards to the TCK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>>>>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
ohhh, kk that explains a lot ;)
sorry, didn't catch that information.
A way to make this clear just in case other projects also get confused (and do not have the maintainer on board) would be to publish the 1.0.9-SNAPSHOT pom with packaging 'pom' containing only the information that is still not final and people should use EA1 instead. Basically the same like we did with javax.* artifacts for a long time.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 3:10 PM
> Just a gentle reminder that
> 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current
> snapshot. The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever existed for 10
> minutes when I
> was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec module.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:13:53
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
> 2 lines
>
> Adding "EA1" to version as this is still
> technically Early Access
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:09:36
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
> 2 lines
>
> Rolled version to 1.1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:03:59
> +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
> 2 lines
>
> Interceptor 1.1 API
>
>
> We could switch it over to something that is not "EA" but
> it would
> still have to be a pre-final number. We won't be able
> to release a
> final "1.0" version number till it passes the final TCK
> which we
> haven't gotten yet.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> > The code has already written, look
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
> >
> > But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> >
> > 2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >
> >> I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding.
> This class is not
> >> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
> >>
> >> Where did it got moved to?
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> >>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
> >>>>>> Do you know what the
> >>> status is on the JCDI library with regards to
> the
> >>> TCK?
> >>> I have been working with TCK and it seems that
> there is no
> >>> problem so far.
> >>>
> >>> --Gurkan
> >>>
> >>> 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan
> Erdogdu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I have looked,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> It is correct now.
> >>>>> But
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are two versions of interceptor
> >>> specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
> >>>>> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> is not.
> >>> AFAIK, its version must be
> >>>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1.
> We use
> >>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't run the final TCK against this
> library, just
> >>> the TCK from
> >>>> November, but it's probably safe to yank
> the EA.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know what the status is on the JCDI
> library
> >>> with regards to the TCK?
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Gurkan Erdogdu
> >>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>
>
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Just a gentle reminder that 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT is the current
snapshot. The 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT only ever existed for 10 minutes when I
was creating the geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec module.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881915 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:13:53 +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Adding "EA1" to version as this is still technically Early Access
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881913 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:09:36 +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Rolled version to 1.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r881909 | dblevins | 2009-11-18 21:03:59 +0100 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009) |
2 lines
Interceptor 1.1 API
We could switch it over to something that is not "EA" but it would
still have to be a pre-final number. We won't be able to release a
final "1.0" version number till it passes the final TCK which we
haven't gotten yet.
-David
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> The code has already written, look
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
>
> But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
>
> --Gurkan
>
>
> 2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding. This class is not
>> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>>
>> Where did it got moved to?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
>>> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
>>>>>> Do you know what the
>>> status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
>>> TCK?
>>> I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no
>>> problem so far.
>>>
>>> --Gurkan
>>>
>>> 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have looked,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>> .
>>>>> It is correct now.
>>>>> But
>>>>>
>>>>> There are two versions of interceptor
>>> specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
>>>>> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not.
>>> AFAIK, its version must be
>>>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use
>>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just
>>> the TCK from
>>>> November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
>>>>
>>>> Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library
>>> with regards to the TCK?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
The code has already written, look
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/src/main/java/javax/interceptor/
But it must be published to SNAPSHOT repository.
--Gurkan
2010/1/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding. This class is not
> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>
> Where did it got moved to?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
> > >>>Do you know what the
> > status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
> > TCK?
> > I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no
> > problem so far.
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> > 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> >
> > >
> > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> > >
> > > I have looked,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > >> .
> > >> It is correct now.
> > >> But
> > >>
> > >> There are two versions of interceptor
> > specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
> > >> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not.
> > AFAIK, its version must be
> > >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use
> > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
> > >>
> > >
> > > I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just
> > the TCK from
> > > November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
> > >
> > > Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library
> > with regards to the TCK?
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
As always, the only binding source is the spec in the JSR. In our case this is JSR-318 [1] which contains the Interceptors 1.1 Specification as addendum.
The spec doesn't say much about InterceptorBinding, but at least it's mentioned:
page 17 "• Added optional @Interceptor/@InterceptorBinding annotations"
Thus I'm d'accord with Gurkan that this annotation should also be available in 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
Should I submit a patch, or do you like to handle that David?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr318/index.html
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 9:15 AM
> I still miss
> javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding. This class is not
> contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>
> Where did it got moved to?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
> > >>>Do you know what the
> > status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
> > TCK?
> > I have been working with TCK and it seems that there
> is no
> > problem so far.
> >
> > --Gurkan
> >
> > 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> >
> > >
> > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have looked,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > >> .
> > >> It is correct now.
> > >> But
> > >>
> > >> There are two versions of interceptor
> > specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
> > >> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is
> not.
> > AFAIK, its version must be
> > >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use
> > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> > >>
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
> > >>
> > >
> > > I haven't run the final TCK against this library,
> just
> > the TCK from
> > > November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
> > >
> > > Do you know what the status is on the JCDI
> library
> > with regards to the TCK?
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gurkan Erdogdu
> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I still miss javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding. This class is not contained in geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
Where did it got moved to?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 1:45 PM
> >>>Do you know what the
> status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
> TCK?
> I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no
> problem so far.
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>
> >
> > On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> >
> > I have looked,
> >>
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >> .
> >> It is correct now.
> >> But
> >>
> >> There are two versions of interceptor
> specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
> >> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not.
> AFAIK, its version must be
> >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
> >>
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
> >>
> >
> > I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just
> the TCK from
> > November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
> >
> > Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library
> with regards to the TCK?
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
>>>Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
TCK?
I have been working with TCK and it seems that there is no problem so far.
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> I have looked,
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
>> .
>> It is correct now.
>> But
>>
>> There are two versions of interceptor specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
>> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not. AFAIK, its version must be
>> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>
> I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just the TCK from
> November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
>
> Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library with regards to the TCK?
>
> -David
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> I have looked,
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/
> .
> It is correct now.
> But
>
> There are two versions of interceptor specification in the repo,
> 1.0.0-EA1
> content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not. AFAIK, its version
> must be
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
I haven't run the final TCK against this library, just the TCK from
November, but it's probably safe to yank the EA.
Do you know what the status is on the JCDI library with regards to the
TCK?
-David
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
I have looked,
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/.
It is correct now.
But
There are two versions of interceptor specification in the repo, 1.0.0-EA1
content is correct but 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT is not. AFAIK, its version must be
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.0.0-EA1. We use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT in OWB.
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec/1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT/
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/1/19 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> I have looked at SNAPSHOTS in repository.apache.org under
>> org.apache.geronimo.specs, but it seems that geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec.jar
>> and
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.jar contents are wrong!
>>
>> Could you publish those projects snapshots ?
>>
>
> They should have been published. Published them again for good measure.
>
> Let me know if these don't look any better.
>
> -David
>
>
>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>> 2010/1/14 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>
>> Heads up on some spec jar changes...
>>>
>>> I've started to run the various geronimo-foo_spec jars through the Java
>>> EE
>>> 6 TCK to ensure the signatures are correct. Once of the adjustments is
>>> that
>>> the javax.interceptor.Interceptor class no longer is marked as
>>> @Stereotype
>>> (also not @Inherited and only useable at TYPE level). I've updated it to
>>> be
>>> compliant and since it no longer has any JCDI dependency I moved the two
>>> classes into the geronimo-interceptor-1.1_spec module. The
>>> "geronimo-cdi_1.0_spec" module has also been renamed to
>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for consistency and the 'provided' dependency on
>>> the
>>> old javaee5 geronimo-interceptor module has been upgraded to the
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>>>
>>> So at some point we'll need to roll over to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec
>>> and
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec modules.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> I have looked at SNAPSHOTS in repository.apache.org under
> org.apache.geronimo.specs, but it seems that geronimo-
> jcdi_1.0_spec.jar and
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.jar contents are wrong!
>
> Could you publish those projects snapshots ?
They should have been published. Published them again for good measure.
Let me know if these don't look any better.
-David
>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 2010/1/14 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>
>> Heads up on some spec jar changes...
>>
>> I've started to run the various geronimo-foo_spec jars through the
>> Java EE
>> 6 TCK to ensure the signatures are correct. Once of the
>> adjustments is that
>> the javax.interceptor.Interceptor class no longer is marked as
>> @Stereotype
>> (also not @Inherited and only useable at TYPE level). I've updated
>> it to be
>> compliant and since it no longer has any JCDI dependency I moved
>> the two
>> classes into the geronimo-interceptor-1.1_spec module. The
>> "geronimo-cdi_1.0_spec" module has also been renamed to
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for consistency and the 'provided'
>> dependency on the
>> old javaee5 geronimo-interceptor module has been upgraded to the
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>>
>> So at some point we'll need to roll over to the geronimo-
>> jcdi_1.0_spec and
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec modules.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
I have looked at SNAPSHOTS in repository.apache.org under
org.apache.geronimo.specs, but it seems that geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec.jar and
geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.jar contents are wrong!
Could you publish those projects snapshots ?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/1/14 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> Heads up on some spec jar changes...
>
> I've started to run the various geronimo-foo_spec jars through the Java EE
> 6 TCK to ensure the signatures are correct. Once of the adjustments is that
> the javax.interceptor.Interceptor class no longer is marked as @Stereotype
> (also not @Inherited and only useable at TYPE level). I've updated it to be
> compliant and since it no longer has any JCDI dependency I moved the two
> classes into the geronimo-interceptor-1.1_spec module. The
> "geronimo-cdi_1.0_spec" module has also been renamed to
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for consistency and the 'provided' dependency on the
> old javaee5 geronimo-interceptor module has been upgraded to the
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>
> So at some point we'll need to roll over to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec modules.
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Re: Interceptor API changes
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <cg...@gmail.com>.
Great! Currently we use 1.1 interceptor specification. But we need to update
name of the cdi.
Then, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5007 can be closed.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/1/14 David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> Heads up on some spec jar changes...
>
> I've started to run the various geronimo-foo_spec jars through the Java EE
> 6 TCK to ensure the signatures are correct. Once of the adjustments is that
> the javax.interceptor.Interceptor class no longer is marked as @Stereotype
> (also not @Inherited and only useable at TYPE level). I've updated it to be
> compliant and since it no longer has any JCDI dependency I moved the two
> classes into the geronimo-interceptor-1.1_spec module. The
> "geronimo-cdi_1.0_spec" module has also been renamed to
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for consistency and the 'provided' dependency on the
> old javaee5 geronimo-interceptor module has been upgraded to the
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec.
>
> So at some point we'll need to roll over to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec and
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec modules.
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com