You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Sam Tunnicliffe (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/01/28 15:19:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-21142) Consensus groups for range movements can omit future owners of merging ranges
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sam Tunnicliffe updated CASSANDRA-21142:
----------------------------------------
Bug Category: Parent values: Correctness(12982)Level 1 values: Consistency(12989)
Complexity: Low Hanging Fruit
Discovered By: Code Inspection
Fix Version/s: 6.x
Severity: Normal
Status: Open (was: Triage Needed)
> Consensus groups for range movements can omit future owners of merging ranges
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-21142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21142
> Project: Apache Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactional Cluster Metadata
> Reporter: Sam Tunnicliffe
> Assignee: Sam Tunnicliffe
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 6.x
>
>
> The consensus group for a range movement operation is union of current and future replicas for all affected ranges. However, when the movement includes a merge of existing ranges (i.e. a node leaving or moving) the future replicas are incorrectly calculated. If a node's only involvement in the operation is to acquire the new merged range, it isn't included in the consensus group.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org