Re: svn commit: r178508 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

[Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>]

nd@apache.org wrote:
> Author: nd
> Date: Wed May 25 11:43:38 2005
> New Revision: 178508
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178508&view=rev

Anyone else think the 90k (pre-encoding) size limit for the split commit 
mails is a little small?  I'd prefer if it was 512k or so to minimize 
the flood of little mails.  I can't imagine anyone subscribes to 
cvs@httpd.apache.org without being able to receive 1MB mails.  (Anybody 
monitoring cvs commits on their blackberry?)

Joshua.

Re: svn commit: r178508 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Joshua Slive wrote:
> 
> 
> nd@apache.org wrote:
> 
>> Author: nd
>> Date: Wed May 25 11:43:38 2005
>> New Revision: 178508
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178508&view=rev
> 
> 
> Anyone else think the 90k (pre-encoding) size limit for the split commit
> mails is a little small?  I'd prefer if it was 512k or so to minimize
> the flood of little mails.  I can't imagine anyone subscribes to
> cvs@httpd.apache.org without being able to receive 1MB mails.  (Anybody
> monitoring cvs commits on their blackberry?)

And if you are doing it on a blackberry, an RSS Feed might be better:

http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/httpd/.rss

and more stats/stuff:
http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/httpd

-Paul

Re: svn commit: r178508 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

[Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>]

André Malo wrote:
> * Joshua Slive wrote:

>>I guess I should have phrased that differently: Would anyone object to
>>raising the limit to 512k?
> 
> 
> I'd treat this as lazy consensus and raise the limit within some days.

Go for it.  I would have done it myself a while ago, except I haven't 
taken the time to figure out how to update the live version without 
messing anything up.  I'm sure you know how to do that.

Joshua.

Re: svn commit: r178508 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

[André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>]

* Joshua Slive wrote:

> Joshua Slive wrote:
> > nd@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: nd
> >> Date: Wed May 25 11:43:38 2005
> >> New Revision: 178508
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178508&view=rev
> >
> > Anyone else think the 90k (pre-encoding) size limit for the split
> > commit mails is a little small?  I'd prefer if it was 512k or so to
> > minimize the flood of little mails.  I can't imagine anyone subscribes
> > to cvs@httpd.apache.org without being able to receive 1MB mails. 
> > (Anybody monitoring cvs commits on their blackberry?)
>
> I guess I should have phrased that differently: Would anyone object to
> raising the limit to 512k?

I'd treat this as lazy consensus and raise the limit within some days.

nd
-- 
"Das Verhalten von Gates hatte mir bewiesen, dass ich auf ihn und seine
beiden Gefährten nicht zu zählen brauchte" -- Karl May, "Winnetou III"

Im Westen was neues: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>

Re: svn commit: r178508 [1/7] - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: ./ mod/

[Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>]

Joshua Slive wrote:
> 
> 
> nd@apache.org wrote:
> 
>> Author: nd
>> Date: Wed May 25 11:43:38 2005
>> New Revision: 178508
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178508&view=rev
> 
> 
> Anyone else think the 90k (pre-encoding) size limit for the split commit 
> mails is a little small?  I'd prefer if it was 512k or so to minimize 
> the flood of little mails.  I can't imagine anyone subscribes to 
> cvs@httpd.apache.org without being able to receive 1MB mails.  (Anybody 
> monitoring cvs commits on their blackberry?)

I guess I should have phrased that differently: Would anyone object to 
raising the limit to 512k?

Joshua.