You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Jörg Michelberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/21 14:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (DIRMINA-1101) InvalidMarkException on session.write when using CompressionFilter.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jörg Michelberger updated DIRMINA-1101:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
I'm updated from a MINA 2.0.7 to the 2.0.20 and am a user of CompressionFilter. Writing of Messages fails with a InvalidMarkException.

Reproducible Test is:
 * Copy MINA Core Test org.apache.mina.core.service.AbstractIoServiceTest to MINA Compression Filter org.apache.mina.filter.compression Test Packages package.
 * Adapt package statement to org.apache.mina.filter.compression.
 * Add Compression to acceptor and connector
 *         acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
         acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
         acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
                 new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
 *         connector.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
         connector.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
         connector.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
                 new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
 * Set a Breakpoint to java.nio.Buffer.reset() method, where the InvalidMarkException is thrown.
 * Run Debug Testfile on org.apache.mina.filter.compression.AbstractIoServiceTest 

After the Exception the session is immediatelly scheduled for disconnect.

It seems that there is a discrepancy between the mark() and reset() calls on the underlaying Buffer. In case of compression, a Buffer with the compressed content is created and is wrapped with the original Buffer in a FilteredWriteRequest, because CompressionFilter is a WriteRequestFilter. This is in WriteRequestFilter.filterWrite()

In DefaultIoFilterChain$HeadFilter.filterWrite() is then the mark() call, which is done on the compressed Buffer.

In AbstractPollingIoProcessor.writeBuffer() is the reset() call, which is in this case done on the original Buffer, leading to the Exception.

It seems that the change at date 16.02.2016

SHA-1: 44b58469f84ce991074cdc187b1c1f23b94cf445
* Don't try to reset a message when it's not a IoBuffer

which reassignes the buf before reset() is called broke it. The buf before reassign looks much better as the right to reset() in this case.

 

{{java.nio.InvalidMarkException}}
 {{    at java.nio.Buffer.reset(Buffer.java:306)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.reset(AbstractIoBuffer.java:425)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.writeBuffer(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1131)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flushNow(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:994)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flush(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:921)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.run(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:688)}}
 {{    at org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64)}}
 {{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)}}
 {{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)}}
 {{    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)}}

  was:
I'm updated from a MINA 2.0.7 to the 2.0.20 and am a user of CompressionFilter. Writing of Messages fails with a InvalidMarkException.

Reproducible Test is:
 * Copy MINA Core Test org.apache.mina.core.service.AbstractIoServiceTest to MINA Compression Filter org.apache.mina.filter.compression Test Packages package.
 * Adapt package statement to org.apache.mina.filter.compression.
 * Add Compression to acceptor and connector
 *         acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
        acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
        acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
                new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
 *         connector.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
        connector.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
        connector.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
                new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
 * Set a Breakpoint to java.nio.Buffer.reset() method, where the InvalidMarkException is thrown.
 * Run Debug Testfile on org.apache.mina.filter.compression.AbstractIoServiceTest 

After the Exception the session is immediatelly scheduled for disconnect.

It seems that there is a discrepancy between the mark() and reset() calls on the underlaying Buffer. In case of compression, a Buffer with the compressed content is created and is wrapped with the original Buffer in a FilteredWriteRequest, because CompressionFilter is a WriteRequestFilter. This is in WriteRequestFilter.filterWrite()

In DefaultIoFilterChain$HeadFilter.filterWrite() is then the mark() call, which is done on the compressed Buffer.

In AbstractPollingIoProcessor.writeBuffer() is the reset() call, which is in this case done on the original Buffer, leading to the Exception.

{{java.nio.InvalidMarkException}}
{{    at java.nio.Buffer.reset(Buffer.java:306)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.reset(AbstractIoBuffer.java:425)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.writeBuffer(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1131)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flushNow(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:994)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flush(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:921)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.run(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:688)}}
{{    at org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64)}}
{{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)}}
{{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)}}
{{    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)}}


> InvalidMarkException on session.write when using CompressionFilter.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-1101
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1101
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.20
>            Reporter: Jörg Michelberger
>            Priority: Major
>
> I'm updated from a MINA 2.0.7 to the 2.0.20 and am a user of CompressionFilter. Writing of Messages fails with a InvalidMarkException.
> Reproducible Test is:
>  * Copy MINA Core Test org.apache.mina.core.service.AbstractIoServiceTest to MINA Compression Filter org.apache.mina.filter.compression Test Packages package.
>  * Adapt package statement to org.apache.mina.filter.compression.
>  * Add Compression to acceptor and connector
>  *         acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
>          acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
>          acceptor.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
>                  new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
>  *         connector.getFilterChain().addLast("compression", new CompressionFilter());
>          connector.getFilterChain().addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter());
>          connector.getFilterChain().addLast("codec",
>                  new ProtocolCodecFilter(new TextLineCodecFactory(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)));
>  * Set a Breakpoint to java.nio.Buffer.reset() method, where the InvalidMarkException is thrown.
>  * Run Debug Testfile on org.apache.mina.filter.compression.AbstractIoServiceTest 
> After the Exception the session is immediatelly scheduled for disconnect.
> It seems that there is a discrepancy between the mark() and reset() calls on the underlaying Buffer. In case of compression, a Buffer with the compressed content is created and is wrapped with the original Buffer in a FilteredWriteRequest, because CompressionFilter is a WriteRequestFilter. This is in WriteRequestFilter.filterWrite()
> In DefaultIoFilterChain$HeadFilter.filterWrite() is then the mark() call, which is done on the compressed Buffer.
> In AbstractPollingIoProcessor.writeBuffer() is the reset() call, which is in this case done on the original Buffer, leading to the Exception.
> It seems that the change at date 16.02.2016
> SHA-1: 44b58469f84ce991074cdc187b1c1f23b94cf445
> * Don't try to reset a message when it's not a IoBuffer
> which reassignes the buf before reset() is called broke it. The buf before reassign looks much better as the right to reset() in this case.
>  
> {{java.nio.InvalidMarkException}}
>  {{    at java.nio.Buffer.reset(Buffer.java:306)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.reset(AbstractIoBuffer.java:425)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.writeBuffer(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:1131)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flushNow(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:994)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.flush(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:921)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoProcessor$Processor.run(AbstractPollingIoProcessor.java:688)}}
>  {{    at org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64)}}
>  {{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)}}
>  {{    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)}}
>  {{    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)