You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Susan Hinrichs (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/13 21:01:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (TS-5092) ATS handling of too many concurrent streams too agressive and maybe out of spec

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Susan Hinrichs reassigned TS-5092:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Susan Hinrichs

> ATS handling of too many concurrent streams too agressive and maybe out of spec
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-5092
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5092
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HTTP/2
>            Reporter: Susan Hinrichs
>            Assignee: Susan Hinrichs
>
> This issue was identified while debugging new errors seen by an internal team after they enabled HTTP/2 in their client. On the backend, they saw an increase in the cases were ATS sends the origin the POST header but no POST body and then closes the connection.
> With the addition of Error() messages we were able to see a case where the client is trying to open the 101'st stream on a session. This is beyond the 100 max concurrent stream limit, so ATS shuts down the session which kills the previous 100 streams.
> A closer reading of section 5.1.2 of the spec (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#section-5.1.2) indicates that this should be a stream error and not a connection error. Bryan Call, Masaori, and Maskit confirmed this interpretation. Maskit also noted that the other error case in the current createStream method must be treated as a connection error.
> Presumably the client library is expecting the refused stream case so it can try again later.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)