You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airavata.apache.org by Sachith Withana <sw...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/29 20:04:51 UTC

Re: Retrieving Experiment Summaries

Saminda,

This a really good implementation. As you said, this can be a very powerful extension of the API.

shouldn’t we also provide a default experiment summary object ( if no fields are set) containing only the Experiment name, status, submit date and the last status update ? Because these would be what most gateways would require essentially. 


On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Emre, that looks exactly like what we want. Thanks for pointing it out. We were targeting for a simple version of "query" for 0.12, but after looking at mongodb docs I can see that if we plan ahead this can be a very powerful extension to the API with regards to data retrieval in future. 
> 
> Terri, you have a very valid point there. Right now its an implied "and". We are trying to keep the data model for SearchQuery as simple as possible. My current mode of thinking is hirarchical filter fields such as,
> 
> {Experiment.Project, "manhattan"}      
> =>  Experiment.Project=="manhattan"
> 
> {{Experiment.Project, "manhattan"}, {Experiment.Created, "03-19-2014",">"}}     
>  =>  Experiment.Project=="manhattan" && Experiment.Created >03-19-2014
> 
> {{Experiment.Project, "manhattan"}, {{Experiment.Status, "done","OR"},{Experiment.Status, "failed"}}, {Experiment.Created, "03-19-2014",">"}}      
> =>  Experiment.Project=="manhattan" && (Experiment.Status=="done" || Experiment.Status=="failed") && Experiment.Created >03-19-2014
> 
> Loosely defined, following could be the grammar of a filter criteria,
> 
> <FIELD_CRITERIA> = {<FIELD_CRITERIA>[,<FIELD_CRITERIA>*]}
> <FIELD_CRITERIA> = {<Field_Name> , <Field_Value> [,Field_Comparison][,Logical_Operator_With_Next_Criteria]}
> 
> wdyt?
> 
> Saminda
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Schwartz, Terri <te...@sdsc.edu> wrote:
> Hi Saminda,
> 
> I'm working on a similar issue in the cipres rest api.  I'm curious about the syntax for filter criteria and how general purpose it will be.  Is there an implied 'and' between the individual criterion?  Can more elaborate boolean expressions be used?  
> 
> Terri
> From: Saminda Wijeratne [samindaw@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:40 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Retrieving Experiment Summaries
> 
> In an offline discussion with Chathuri, we came up with a simple way for gateway developers to specify retrieving a filtered set of experiment data based on the requirements of the gateway user.
> 
> eg:
> 
> SearchQuery query = 
> new SearchQuery({Experiment.Name, Experiment.Status}, {{Experiment.Owner,"bob"},{Experiment.Project,"manhattan"}{Experiment.Created,"03-19-2014",">"})
> List<Experiment> experiments = thriftAPI.getExperiments(query);
> 
> Sample syntax
> sq = new SearchQuery(<list of fields that needs to be filled>, <list of filter criteria for the data>)
> 
> Further more the SearchQuery will have the capability to specify paging (eg; experiments from 11 to 20). 
> 
> wdyt?
> 
> Saminda
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For performance issues a gateway should only request a subset of data of an experiment from Airavata server to compile a summary view of the experiment to the scientist. Based on my current experience I feel the following data is required to compile a general summary.
> 
>   - Exp ID/Name
>   - Status
>   - Project
>   - Owner/Creation time
> +1, We can show minimum data and give detailed view on-demand. But I think we need to support experiment search based on some criteria and develop an index for each search criteria, because if I ran jobs for 6 months and I would never want to get all my experiments, even thought we make it super fast will minimum data.
> 
> ex: I want to search the experiments I ran last week, or with some text base search. 
> 
> We can use the above solution Saminda suggested in searching too.
> 
> Lahiru
> 
> We have seeing a direct relationship between the number of experiment data records and the turnaround time. Thus we may need some paging when requesting the experiment data.
> 
> wdyt? Your thoughts are welcome.
> 
> (Using JIRA [1] to track the status of this task)
> 
> A detailed discussion on the topic is on the Architecture mailing list [2].
> 
> Regards,
> Saminda
> 
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-995
> 2. http://www.mail-archive.com/architecture@airavata.apache.org/msg00080.html
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> System Analyst Programmer
> PTI Lab
> Indiana University
> 
>