You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Andy Jefferson <an...@jpox.org> on 2005/11/10 18:19:52 UTC
Latest JDOQL tests
Hi Michael,
have been through your latest JDOQL tests that were checked in yesterday, and
applied necessary changes to JPOX.
Some things for you also I think :-
1. MetadataSearchOrder.testPackageJDOQuery - this complains about not finding the
"jdoquery" file. By my understanding the jdoquery file is not being placed in the
"enhanced" directory, and hence JPOX would be working miracles to find it. Can
you check ?
2. SingleStringQuery.testPositive - this uses IMPORT in capitals. Should be lowercase
--
Andy
Re: Latest JDOQL tests
Posted by Michael Watzek <mw...@spree.de>.
Hi Andy,
I checked in the fixes.
I renamed method MetadataSearchOrder.testPackageJDOQuery to
MetadataSearchOrder.testClassJDOQuery because the meta data in file
Person.jdoquery only concerns class Person.
The test MetadataSearchOrder still fails though the .jdoquery file is
contained in the enhanced jars. Please have a look.
Note: When you run the test the first time, make sure to delete the
enhanced jars. Otherwise, the timestamp check will fail because your jar
is newer that the meta data files under test/jdo. As a consequence, the
jars will not be regenerated.
The test SingleStringQuery succeeds for the first query. It fails for
the second query. There, the result of the query is overwritten passing
null (Query.setResult(null)) but query execution still returns object
arrays having firstname and lastname.
I also fixed the issue of comparing object arrays as part of that checkin.
Regards,
Michael
> Hi Andy,
>
> you are right concerning both issues below. I'll fix that.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> have been through your latest JDOQL tests that were checked in
>> yesterday, and
>> applied necessary changes to JPOX.
>> Some things for you also I think :-
>>
>> 1. MetadataSearchOrder.testPackageJDOQuery - this complains about not
>> finding the
>> "jdoquery" file. By my understanding the jdoquery file is not being
>> placed in the
>> "enhanced" directory, and hence JPOX would be working miracles to find
>> it. Can
>> you check ?
>>
>> 2. SingleStringQuery.testPositive - this uses IMPORT in capitals.
>> Should be lowercase
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andy
>
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Watzek Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mwa.tech@spree.de Buelowstr. 66
Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany
Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Latest JDOQL tests
Posted by Michael Watzek <mw...@spree.de>.
Hi Andy,
you are right concerning both issues below. I'll fix that.
Thanks,
Michael
> Hi Michael,
>
> have been through your latest JDOQL tests that were checked in yesterday, and
> applied necessary changes to JPOX.
> Some things for you also I think :-
>
> 1. MetadataSearchOrder.testPackageJDOQuery - this complains about not finding the
> "jdoquery" file. By my understanding the jdoquery file is not being placed in the
> "enhanced" directory, and hence JPOX would be working miracles to find it. Can
> you check ?
>
> 2. SingleStringQuery.testPositive - this uses IMPORT in capitals. Should be lowercase
>
>
> --
> Andy
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Watzek Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mwa.tech@spree.de Buelowstr. 66
Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany
Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------