You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> on 2009/08/23 15:26:26 UTC
[Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Well, after a second thought, the OidRegistry is useless. We can use the
SO registries instead of the unique OidRegistry, as we laready have a
way to find a SO from its OID using this data structure. We just have to
extend it by adding a name->SO to be able to cover the same
functionalities offered by the current OidRegistry.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Cool :)
This is perfect timing as we're working with Stefan on improving the Schema
Editor for our next releases.
Thanks,
P-A
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
>> Does this mean that a single SchemaObjectRegistry will allow the lookup of
>> objects by name AND oid ?
>> If yes, we would make a great use of that in Studio.
>>
>>
> Short answer : yes.
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Does this mean that a single SchemaObjectRegistry will allow the lookup of
> objects by name AND oid ?
> If yes, we would make a great use of that in Studio.
>
Short answer : yes.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Does this mean that a single SchemaObjectRegistry will allow the lookup of
objects by name AND oid ?
If yes, we would make a great use of that in Studio.
Regards,
P-A
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> Well, after a second thought, the OidRegistry is useless. We can use the SO
> registries instead of the unique OidRegistry, as we laready have a way to
> find a SO from its OID using this data structure. We just have to extend it
> by adding a name->SO to be able to cover the same functionalities offered by
> the current OidRegistry.
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
>
Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> So it sounds to me like you're making the OID registry capable of returning
> any kind of SchemaObject when you look up by OID instead of just confirming
> OID exists or looking OID by alias name?
>
No, the OID registry is just there to guarantee OID uniqueness. It's not
anymore a MAP, it's a Set (or it should be)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [Schema refactoring] OidRegistry, 2
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@gmail.com>.
So it sounds to me like you're making the OID registry capable of returning
any kind of SchemaObject when you look up by OID instead of just confirming
OID exists or looking OID by alias name?
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>wrote:
> Well, after a second thought, the OidRegistry is useless. We can use the SO
> registries instead of the unique OidRegistry, as we laready have a way to
> find a SO from its OID using this data structure. We just have to extend it
> by adding a name->SO to be able to cover the same functionalities offered by
> the current OidRegistry.
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
>
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org