You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan Cabrera (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2005/10/28 07:42:13 UTC

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-744) Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744?page=all ]

Alan Cabrera reassigned GERONIMO-744:
-------------------------------------

    Assign To: Alan Cabrera

> Review specs and move them from rc versions to formal versions
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-744
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Task
>   Components: specs, dependencies
>     Versions: 1.0-M4
>     Reporter: John Sisson
>     Assignee: Alan Cabrera
>      Fix For: 1.0

>
> Currently Geronimo is depending upon release candidate and snapshot versions of the specs JARs.
> See mail dev list mail thread for Jeremy's proposal "Release specs as a separate distro from M4":
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112084085400004&r=1&w=2
> Dain suggested "Before we make the final spec releases, maybe we should all pick one  or two spec modules to review for obvious issues. I'll take qname since it only has one class ;)"
> Maybe we should create and assign a JIRA subtasks for the review of each spec, so this work can be tracked.
> I have created separate issues for specs that need to be moved from SNAPSHOTS for the M4 release and I will leave this issue to deal with the review of the specs and moving them from release candidate to formal releases.  Shall we aim for the formal releases in M5?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira