You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/11/12 09:32:09 UTC

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] borisstoyanov opened a new issue #13: Account type, do we still need it with primate?

borisstoyanov opened a new issue #13: Account type, do we still need it with primate?
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/13
 
 
   This is a bit of general structure of Cloudstack, not UI, but still... 
   
   AFAIK we use account type to figure out the rendering of the old UI, and there's multiple references across different account entities which are probably deprecated by now from dynamic roles. 
   
   Question is, do we still need account types with the new UI? Can we get rid of this legacy code? 
   
   This diverges from a problem which I'm facing currently with some of the APIs still following accountype, but not the new roles model. 
   
   The outcome of this ticket is not to fix it here, but to raise a discussion and  figure out if it's feasible. 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services