You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by James Peach <jo...@gmail.com> on 2017/10/05 15:33:58 UTC

Re: RFC: Partition Awareness

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Megha Sharma <ms...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you all for the feedback.
> To summarize, not killing tasks for non-Partition Aware frameworks will make the schedulers see a higher volume of non terminal updates for tasks for which they have already received a TASK_LOST but nothing new that they are not seeing today. So, this shouldn’t be a breaking change for frameworks and this will make the partition awareness logic simpler. I will update MESOS-7215 with the details once the design is ready.

What happens for short-lived frameworks? That is, the lost task comes back, causing the master to track its framework as disconnected, but the framework is gone and will never return.

J