You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Andres de la Peña (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/09/15 14:32:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-16959) nodetool setstreamthroughput accepts invalid arguments that are not immediately applied

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andres de la Peña updated CASSANDRA-16959:
------------------------------------------
    Description: 
Both {{nodetool setstreamthroughput}} and {{nodetool setinterdcstreamthroughput}} accept a negative throughput. The throughput value is not immediately applied to the corresponding rate limiters. Instead, the value is [set in the {{Config}}|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/09c89e5f5f8604301c233130dfb6e82a36ae30f3/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/service/StorageService.java#L1488] and it's only applied to the singleton rate limiter when new sstable stream writer are created (see [here|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/09c89e5f5f8604301c233130dfb6e82a36ae30f3/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/streaming/StreamManager.java#L66-L76]). This could happen much later than the definition of the new throughput, and by then the setting of the new rate in the rate limiter will fail with an {{IllegalArgumentException}} due to the negative value.

I think we should either immediately reject negative throughputs or consider them unlimited, as we do with zero. Also we should probably apply the new throughput to the rate limiter immediately, since I don't see why we should wait to start using the new throughput.

  was:
Both {{nodetool setstreamthroughput}} and {{nodetool setinterdcstreamthroughput}} accept a negative throughput. The throughput value is not immediately applied to the corresponding rate limiters. Instead, the value is set in the {{Config}} and it's only applied to the singleton rate limiter when new sstable stream writer are created, which could happen much later. By then the setting of the new rate in the rate limiter will fail with an {{IllegalArgumentException}} due to the negative value.

I think we should either immediately reject negative throughputs or consider them unlimited, as we do with zero. Also we should probably apply the new throughput to the rate limiter immediately, since I don't see why we should wait to start using the new throughput.


> nodetool setstreamthroughput accepts invalid arguments that are not immediately applied
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16959
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16959
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tool/nodetool
>            Reporter: Andres de la Peña
>            Assignee: Andres de la Peña
>            Priority: Normal
>
> Both {{nodetool setstreamthroughput}} and {{nodetool setinterdcstreamthroughput}} accept a negative throughput. The throughput value is not immediately applied to the corresponding rate limiters. Instead, the value is [set in the {{Config}}|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/09c89e5f5f8604301c233130dfb6e82a36ae30f3/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/service/StorageService.java#L1488] and it's only applied to the singleton rate limiter when new sstable stream writer are created (see [here|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/09c89e5f5f8604301c233130dfb6e82a36ae30f3/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/streaming/StreamManager.java#L66-L76]). This could happen much later than the definition of the new throughput, and by then the setting of the new rate in the rate limiter will fail with an {{IllegalArgumentException}} due to the negative value.
> I think we should either immediately reject negative throughputs or consider them unlimited, as we do with zero. Also we should probably apply the new throughput to the rate limiter immediately, since I don't see why we should wait to start using the new throughput.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org