You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> on 2006/09/01 18:07:27 UTC

Refactoring WS Projects [ Was : Re: WSS4J 2.0(?)]

Jaliya Ekanayake wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Few thoughts from me.
> 
> We cannot expect people to use QoS projects like Kandula and Sandesha
> without axis1 or axis2 and also we can expect axiom and WSS4J to be used
> more independently. In addition they all come under WS* projects. So I
> would like to suggest this.
> 

Jaliya did u mean Axiom also should come under WS*? If yes, I do not
agree with you. I'd rather lean towards Ruchith's and Ajith's suggestion.
Axiom, XmlSchema can be projects useful even outside WS*.
If you mean the same thing, apologies in advance :). Just making sure we
all are in the same camp.

-- Chinthaka


Re: Refactoring WS Projects [ Was : Re: WSS4J 2.0(?)]

Posted by Jaliya Ekanayake <jn...@gmail.com>.
Oops, I did not mean to get them under WS*, we can keep them outside WS*

-Jaliya

On 9/1/06, Eran Chinthaka <ch...@opensource.lk> wrote:
>
> Jaliya Ekanayake wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Few thoughts from me.
> >
> > We cannot expect people to use QoS projects like Kandula and Sandesha
> > without axis1 or axis2 and also we can expect axiom and WSS4J to be used
> > more independently. In addition they all come under WS* projects. So I
> > would like to suggest this.
> >
>
> Jaliya did u mean Axiom also should come under WS*? If yes, I do not
> agree with you. I'd rather lean towards Ruchith's and Ajith's suggestion.
> Axiom, XmlSchema can be projects useful even outside WS*.
> If you mean the same thing, apologies in advance :). Just making sure we
> all are in the same camp.
>
> -- Chinthaka
>
>
>
>