You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@community.apache.org by km...@apache.org on 2011/02/11 18:07:42 UTC

svn commit: r1069891 - /comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext

Author: kmarsden
Date: Fri Feb 11 17:07:42 2011
New Revision: 1069891

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069891&view=rev
Log:
Update mentee ranking process to include IRC as one of the accepted full point interview methods.


Modified:
    comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext

Modified: comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext?rev=1069891&r1=1069890&r2=1069891&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext (original)
+++ comdev/site/trunk/content/mentee-ranking-process.mdtext Fri Feb 11 17:07:42 2011
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ with the results? (0-4 points)
 technical relevance, completeness, awareness of issues, realistic planning
 (less copy and paste)? (0-4 points)
 * How does the mentor rate the student's chances of success, based on an
-in-person (face-to-face, video, audio, email) interview? (0-3 points, or
+in-person (face-to-face, video, audio, IRC,  email) interview? (0-3 points, or
 0-1 if email interview only)
 * How do we rate the originality of the student's contributions to the
 proposal? (0-2 points, 0 if mentor provides proposal, 1 if student builds