You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> on 2021/03/11 18:18:40 UTC
[DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Hello,
We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
[1].
I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
WDYT?
Regards,
Ismael
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
[3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
> Le 11 mars 2021 à 19:18, Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
> [1].
>
> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards,
> Ismael
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Etienne Chauchot <ec...@apache.org>.
Hi,
+1 on drop
Etienne
On 12/03/2021 20:39, Ismaël Mejía wrote:
>> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
> Yes and that's clearly too much given that the Flink community only
> support the two latest release.
> It also hits us because we run tests for all those versions on precommit.
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:27 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
>> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
>>
>> Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
>>>
>>> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +user
>>>>
>>>>> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
>>>>>> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
>>>>>> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
>>>>>> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
>>>>>> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Ismael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Yes and that's clearly too much given that the Flink community only
support the two latest release.
It also hits us because we run tests for all those versions on precommit.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:27 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
>
> Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
>>
>> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +user
>>>
>>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>>
>>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
>>> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
>>> >> [1].
>>> >>
>>> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
>>> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
>>> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
>>> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>>> >>
>>> >> WDYT?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Ismael
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>>> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Yes and that's clearly too much given that the Flink community only
support the two latest release.
It also hits us because we run tests for all those versions on precommit.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:27 PM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
>
> Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
>>
>> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +user
>>>
>>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>>
>>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
>>> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
>>> >> [1].
>>> >>
>>> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
>>> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
>>> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
>>> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>>> >>
>>> >> WDYT?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Ismael
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>>> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>.
Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
>
> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +user
>>
>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
>> previous
>> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
>> releases
>> >> [1].
>> >>
>> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink
>> 1.8 and
>> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring
>> the
>> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone
>> has a
>> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ismael
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>.
Do we now support 1.8 through 1.12?
Unless there are specific objections, makes sense to me.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
>
> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +user
>>
>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
>> previous
>> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
>> releases
>> >> [1].
>> >>
>> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink
>> 1.8 and
>> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring
>> the
>> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone
>> has a
>> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Ismael
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.
+1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> +user
>
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <kenn@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
> >> [1].
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E>
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948>
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.
+1 too but are there any potential objections for this?
> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:21, David Morávek <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> +user
>
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <kenn@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <iemejia@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
> >> [1].
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E>
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948>
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by David Morávek <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
D.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +user
>
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
> previous
> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
> releases
> >> [1].
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink
> 1.8 and
> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring
> the
> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has
> a
> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by David Morávek <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
D.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:33 PM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +user
>
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
> previous
> >> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
> releases
> >> [1].
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink
> 1.8 and
> >> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring
> the
> >> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has
> a
> >> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+user
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
Sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
>> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
>> [1].
>>
>> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
>> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
>> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
>> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ismael
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com>.
+user
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
Sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:24 PM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in previous
>> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three releases
>> [1].
>>
>> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8 and
>> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
>> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
>> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ismael
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Flink 1.8 and 1.9
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org>.
Should we add a warning or something to 2.29.0?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been supporting older versions of Flink that we had agreed in
> previous
> discussions where we said we will be supporting only the latest three
> releases
> [1].
>
> I would like to propose that for Beam 2.30.0 we stop supporting Flink 1.8
> and
> 1.9 [2]. I prepared a PR for this [3] but of course I wanted to bring the
> subject here (and to user@) for your attention and in case someone has a
> different opinion or reason to still support the older versions.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards,
> Ismael
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb5ac9d889d0e3f4400471de3c25000a15352bde879622c899d97581%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11948
> [3] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14203
>