You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@olingo.apache.org by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com> on 2016/05/18 12:27:12 UTC
Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Hi,
For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users something to work with. Are there any features you would like to introduce beforehand?
From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to have ready by next week.
WDYT?
Best Regards,
Christian
Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com>.
Christian,
One community user verified patch, would you also like to review before I merge into this master? Otherwise, I am good to goahead with merging this feature then we can do a beta release.
Thanks
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> Christian, Michael, Community
>
> I have the changes ready for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-567
> in feature branch here
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=olingo-odata4.git;a=commit;h=15b6fa0d852747db5ffdbc99f89b76cd0c6a8361
>
> Can one of you give it a review, and let me know of any changes. Once this is
> resolved I can start working on the next feature.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ramesh..
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi Ramesh,
> >
> > I don`t have time currently to produce the beta release so I think we can
> > wait for the feature.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Christian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Freitag, 27. Mai 2016 00:08
> > To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
> >
> > Christian,
> >
> > I got lot of metadata=full implemented, but having some specification
> > interpretation issues with Bound [Actions|Functions] with "Collections" as
> > binding parameters. Also binding parameter does not seem to limit to
> > EntityType alone, it can be of *any* type. Thanks means we would need to
> > support reading/writing of operations on entity, primitive, complec and
> > collection variations of same. That kind opens up more burden on the
> > serializer/de-serializer. That is fine. But looking at client side for
> > reading these methods templates looks to be little troublesome, as
> > serializers on client side also needs to be modified. So, it is taking more
> > time then I anticipated :(
> >
> > Ramesh..
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > IMHO we can also postpone the beta if the metadata=full is not ready
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 15:23
> > > To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
> > >
> > > I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have
> > > initial version ready by next week.
> > >
> > > Ramesh..
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that
> > > > I
> > > > would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
> > > >
> > > > For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> > > > something to work with. Are there any features you would like to
> > > > introduce
> > > > beforehand?
> > > > From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope
> > > > to
> > > > have ready by next week.
> > > >
> > > > WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Christian
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com>.
Christian, Michael, Community
I have the changes ready for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-567 in feature branch here
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=olingo-odata4.git;a=commit;h=15b6fa0d852747db5ffdbc99f89b76cd0c6a8361
Can one of you give it a review, and let me know of any changes. Once this is resolved I can start working on the next feature.
Thanks.
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Ramesh,
>
> I don`t have time currently to produce the beta release so I think we can
> wait for the feature.
>
> Best Regards,
> Christian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 27. Mai 2016 00:08
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
>
> Christian,
>
> I got lot of metadata=full implemented, but having some specification
> interpretation issues with Bound [Actions|Functions] with "Collections" as
> binding parameters. Also binding parameter does not seem to limit to
> EntityType alone, it can be of *any* type. Thanks means we would need to
> support reading/writing of operations on entity, primitive, complec and
> collection variations of same. That kind opens up more burden on the
> serializer/de-serializer. That is fine. But looking at client side for
> reading these methods templates looks to be little troublesome, as
> serializers on client side also needs to be modified. So, it is taking more
> time then I anticipated :(
>
> Ramesh..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > IMHO we can also postpone the beta if the metadata=full is not ready
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 15:23
> > To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
> >
> > I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have
> > initial version ready by next week.
> >
> > Ramesh..
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I
> > > would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
> > >
> > > For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> > > something to work with. Are there any features you would like to
> > > introduce
> > > beforehand?
> > > From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to
> > > have ready by next week.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Christian
> > >
> >
>
RE: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com>.
Hi Ramesh,
I don`t have time currently to produce the beta release so I think we can wait for the feature.
Best Regards,
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
Sent: Freitag, 27. Mai 2016 00:08
To: dev@olingo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Christian,
I got lot of metadata=full implemented, but having some specification interpretation issues with Bound [Actions|Functions] with "Collections" as binding parameters. Also binding parameter does not seem to limit to EntityType alone, it can be of *any* type. Thanks means we would need to support reading/writing of operations on entity, primitive, complec and collection variations of same. That kind opens up more burden on the serializer/de-serializer. That is fine. But looking at client side for reading these methods templates looks to be little troublesome, as serializers on client side also needs to be modified. So, it is taking more time then I anticipated :(
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> IMHO we can also postpone the beta if the metadata=full is not ready
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 15:23
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
>
> I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have
> initial version ready by next week.
>
> Ramesh..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I
> > would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
> >
> > For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> > something to work with. Are there any features you would like to introduce
> > beforehand?
> > From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to
> > have ready by next week.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Christian
> >
>
Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com>.
Christian,
I got lot of metadata=full implemented, but having some specification interpretation issues with Bound [Actions|Functions] with "Collections" as binding parameters. Also binding parameter does not seem to limit to EntityType alone, it can be of *any* type. Thanks means we would need to support reading/writing of operations on entity, primitive, complec and collection variations of same. That kind opens up more burden on the serializer/de-serializer. That is fine. But looking at client side for reading these methods templates looks to be little troublesome, as serializers on client side also needs to be modified. So, it is taking more time then I anticipated :(
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> IMHO we can also postpone the beta if the metadata=full is not ready
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 15:23
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
>
> I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have
> initial version ready by next week.
>
> Ramesh..
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I
> > would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
> >
> > For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> > something to work with. Are there any features you would like to introduce
> > beforehand?
> > From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to
> > have ready by next week.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Christian
> >
>
RE: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by "Amend, Christian" <ch...@sap.com>.
IMHO we can also postpone the beta if the metadata=full is not ready
-----Original Message-----
From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:rareddy@redhat.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2016 15:23
To: dev@olingo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have initial version ready by next week.
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I
> would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
>
> For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> something to work with. Are there any features you would like to introduce
> beforehand?
> From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to
> have ready by next week.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Best Regards,
> Christian
>
Re: Should we make a 4.3.0 Beta release and a 2.0.7 release?
Posted by Ramesh Reddy <ra...@redhat.com>.
I started working on "odata.metadata=full" feature, hopefully I will have initial version ready by next week.
Ramesh..
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> For the 2.0.x code line a lot of fixes have been implemented. For that I
> would suggest a new 2.0.7 release which was also requested here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-749
>
> For the 4.3.0 code line we could make a beta release to give our users
> something to work with. Are there any features you would like to introduce
> beforehand?
> From my side I would like to introduce a $apply processor which I hope to
> have ready by next week.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Best Regards,
> Christian
>