Re: scrolling window : dojo dialog vs thickbox

[Paul Stanton <pa...@gunnsoft.com.au>]

well, there's the issue of software bloat as well. I'm sure someone 
could write some components around jquery to rival the dojo components, 
but including both by default would be a bad idea imho.

is this an issue worth raising with the dojo team? since dojo is the 
chosen javascript platform for tapestry shouldn't we focus on getting it 
up to speed before considering alternatives/compliments?

Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> I'd love to be able to support jquery / others as addition javascript
> handlers.  ...Perhaps this is something we can address in the 4.1.3 dev
> cycle.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org

Re: scrolling window : dojo dialog vs thickbox

[Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>]

p.s. I don't know for sure yet but think there is a very good chance someone
may be fiddling with things a little here and there soon to make prototype
available as well and eliminate the arbitrary inclusion of js on pages not
needing it.

On 5/31/07, Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wasn't suggesting having both running together.   More along the lines
> of what I implemented in Tacos originally - which supports both prototype
> and dojo - not necessarily strictly one or another.
>
> On 5/31/07, Paul Stanton <pa...@gunnsoft.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > well, there's the issue of software bloat as well. I'm sure someone
> > could write some components around jquery to rival the dojo components,
> > but including both by default would be a bad idea imho.
> >
> > is this an issue worth raising with the dojo team? since dojo is the
> > chosen javascript platform for tapestry shouldn't we focus on getting it
> > up to speed before considering alternatives/compliments?
> >
> > Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > > I'd love to be able to support jquery / others as addition javascript
> > > handlers.  ...Perhaps this is something we can address in the 4.1.3dev
> > > cycle.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jesse Kuhnert
> Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer
>
> Open source based consulting work centered around
> dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
>



-- 
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

Re: scrolling window : dojo dialog vs thickbox

[Jesse Kuhnert <jk...@gmail.com>]

I wasn't suggesting having both running together.   More along the lines of
what I implemented in Tacos originally - which supports both prototype and
dojo - not necessarily strictly one or another.

On 5/31/07, Paul Stanton <pa...@gunnsoft.com.au> wrote:
>
> well, there's the issue of software bloat as well. I'm sure someone
> could write some components around jquery to rival the dojo components,
> but including both by default would be a bad idea imho.
>
> is this an issue worth raising with the dojo team? since dojo is the
> chosen javascript platform for tapestry shouldn't we focus on getting it
> up to speed before considering alternatives/compliments?
>
> Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> > I'd love to be able to support jquery / others as addition javascript
> > handlers.  ...Perhaps this is something we can address in the 4.1.3 dev
> > cycle.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com