free tlds considered as freemail ?

[Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>]

maybe if it could be done in freemail ?

is it inccorect bark to bark on ?

i write it to get some debate on it, not to begin implementing anything 
yet

Re: free tlds considered as freemail ?

[Ángel <sa...@16bits.net>]

On 2020-11-09 at 11:42 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i mean if the tld is free, can the domain name be non free then ?

Yes. Even though the TLD offers domains for free (not tlds for free
:P) there is a paying layer where you can pay money for having them.

I have seen a spammer use such kind of paid domain. Too bad, as it
would have been simpler to have their domain canceled if iy was on the
free tier.

Regards

Re: free tlds considered as freemail ?

[Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.eu>]

Dan Malm skrev den 2020-11-09 10:31:

> I just consider free tlds spam (at least some of them):

thanks, will try to add it to rule set i have here, ly tld is the one i 
like to add, you have it outside of freemail so this is what i will 
maybe change it to, so it just being freemail rule hits not more custom 
rule names as it will be with what you do

i mean if the tld is free, can the domain name be non free then ?

Re: free tlds considered as freemail ?

[Dan Malm <da...@one.com>]

On 2020-11-09 09:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> maybe if it could be done in freemail ?
> 
> is it inccorect bark to bark on ?
> 
> i write it to get some debate on it, not to begin implementing anything yet

I just consider free tlds spam (at least some of them):
header 		DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_FROM  From:addr =~ /\.(tk|ml|ga|cf|gq)$/i
describe 	DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_FROM  Free TLD Abuse
score 		DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_FROM  5

uri 		DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_URI   /\.(tk|ml|ga|cf|gq)($|\/)/i
describe 	DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_URI   Free TLD Abuse
score 		DAM_SOMETLD_ARE_WORSE_TLD_URI   1.5

-- 
BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com