You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2005/01/10 23:21:04 UTC

Re: [Bug 4072] SPF_PASS false match

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Daniel Quinlan writes:
> > Do we want to fix this for 3.0.3, or just leaving it for 3.1?
> 
> I'm okay with backporting, but I think we're nearing the point at which
> we buckle down on 3.1 and focus on it.  The tree is remarkably stable
> right now and there are a number of significant improvements, so I'm
> starting to think about actually sticking to the aggressive schedule
> that was proposed a few months ago.  :-)

+1.   I think we should only do a 3.0.3 if something serious (security,
data loss, etc.) comes up.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFB4v/QMJF5cimLx9ARAgkkAJ0SuiBX6eOw2mWHKXZw6K3FR603ugCdE+kW
ekq0zXOQGaGEGuYaMZo7adk=
=YWNa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----