You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org> on 2007/10/16 23:05:48 UTC

[VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.

   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/

Should we release this?

Doug

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Raghu Angadi <ra...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Nigel Daley wrote:
> I don't think so.  It looks like it's not a regression.

It is a regression in the sense app that used to work before throws 
exception now. But there is a workaround (with a code change in app) may 
not be required for 0.14.3

Raghu.

> On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:
> 
>>
>> Should HADOOP-2067 be fixed and included in 0.14.3?
>>
>> Doug Cutting wrote:
>>> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
>>> Should we release this?
>>> Doug
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Arun C Murthy <ar...@yahoo-inc.com>.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:24:21AM -0700, Nigel Daley wrote:
>I don't think so.  It looks like it's not a regression.
>

How about HADOOP-2033?

If not, +1.

Arun

>On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:
>
>>
>>Should HADOOP-2067 be fixed and included in 0.14.3?
>>
>>Doug Cutting wrote:
>>>I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
>>>Should we release this?
>>>Doug
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
I don't think so.  It looks like it's not a regression.

On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Raghu Angadi wrote:

>
> Should HADOOP-2067 be fixed and included in 0.14.3?
>
> Doug Cutting wrote:
>> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
>>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
>> Should we release this?
>> Doug
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Raghu Angadi <ra...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Should HADOOP-2067 be fixed and included in 0.14.3?

Doug Cutting wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
> 
> Should we release this?
> 
> Doug

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1

On Oct 17, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Mukund Madhugiri wrote:

> +1
>
> Unit tests passed on:
>    - Windows
>    - Linux
>
> The following benchmark jobs passed on cluster sizes of 20, 100 and  
> 500
> nodes:
>    - TestDFSIO
>    - MRBench (aka SmallJobs)
>    - NNBench
>    - Sort (RandomWriter, Sort, SortValidation) - Also passed on 900  
> node cluster
>
> Thanks,
> Mukund
>
>
>
> Doug Cutting wrote:
>> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
>>
>>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
>>
>> Should we release this?
>>
>> Doug
>

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.14.3 (candidate 0)

Posted by Mukund Madhugiri <mu...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1

Unit tests passed on:
    - Windows
    - Linux

The following benchmark jobs passed on cluster sizes of 20, 100 and 500
nodes:
    - TestDFSIO
    - MRBench (aka SmallJobs)
    - NNBench
    - Sort (RandomWriter, Sort, SortValidation) - Also passed on 900 node cluster

Thanks,
Mukund



Doug Cutting wrote:
> I've created a candidate build for Hadoop 0.14.3.
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.14.3-candidate-0/
>
> Should we release this?
>
> Doug