You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/02/10 17:12:05 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-2301) Documentation of different executeBatch error handling between embedded and DerbyNetClient needed

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Myrna van Lunteren resolved DERBY-2301.
---------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0

committed with revision 505714.

> Documentation of different executeBatch error handling between embedded and DerbyNetClient needed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2301
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2301
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>         Assigned To: Myrna van Lunteren
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-2301.diff
>
>
> There is a difference between embedded and networkserver/DerbyNetClient in how error situations when using java.sql.Statement.executeBatch() and related batch methods are handled.
> Embedded 'stops' processing on error, the Client continues. The second mechanism was added as ok behavior with JDBC3.0, I believe, and both are acceptable approaches.
> However, it could be disconcerting to an unsuspecting user, seeing as both drivers come from the 'same' codeline, and it should be listed under the differences in the Server and Admin Guide.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.