You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com> on 2010/05/14 04:59:01 UTC
HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Hello all,
I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
(link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches are
for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I apply
Todd Lipcon's patch at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt.
Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
Thank you.
Regards,
Raghava.
Fwd: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com>.
(forwarding this email from common-user mailing list)
Hi all,
I will briefly describe the problem again. In the installation
requirements page of HBase -
http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements,
it is given that we should apply patch HDFS-630. It is also mentioned that
this HBase version is only for Hadoop 0.20.x. But the latest patch of
HDFS-630 is for Hadoop 0.21. There is a patch for Cloudera's version of
Hadoop 0.20 but not for Apache Hadoop 0.20.x. How can I get around this
problem of finding the right patch?
Thank you.
Regards,
Raghava.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
To: common-user@hadoop.apache.org
oops, sorry, by really required I meant, would that problem arise only in
any special situations or is it required for normal operations also.
Regards,
Raghava.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Raghava Mutharaju <
m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Todd,
>
> Oh, then isn't it a bit contradictory to the instructions on HBase overview
> page.
>
>
>
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
>
> It says that the current version of HBase works only with 0.20.X and asks
> users to apply the patch HDFS-630 but that patch is not available for
> 0.20.X. Is there any work around for this? Is that patch really required?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Raghava.
>
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
>> m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Todd,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop
>> is
>> > installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop
>> first.
>> > Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
>> > have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
>> > development,
>> > there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of
>> Hadoop
>> > isn't it?
>> >
>>
>> No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
>> wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
>> stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Raghava,
>> > >
>> > > Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
>> > > applies
>> > > on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop
>> that
>> > > already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's
>> CDH2.
>> > >
>> > > -Todd
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
>> > > m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello all,
>> > > >
>> > > > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
>> > requirements
>> > > > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2
>> patches
>> > > are
>> > > > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
>> > > apply
>> > > > Todd Lipcon's patch at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
>> > > > .
>> > > > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures
>> have
>> > > > changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Raghava.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Todd Lipcon
>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>
>
Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com>.
oops, sorry, by really required I meant, would that problem arise only in
any special situations or is it required for normal operations also.
Regards,
Raghava.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Raghava Mutharaju <
m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Todd,
>
> Oh, then isn't it a bit contradictory to the instructions on HBase overview
> page.
>
>
>
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
>
> It says that the current version of HBase works only with 0.20.X and asks
> users to apply the patch HDFS-630 but that patch is not available for
> 0.20.X. Is there any work around for this? Is that patch really required?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Raghava.
>
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
>> m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Todd,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop
>> is
>> > installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop
>> first.
>> > Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
>> > have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
>> > development,
>> > there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of
>> Hadoop
>> > isn't it?
>> >
>>
>> No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
>> wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
>> stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Raghava,
>> > >
>> > > Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
>> > > applies
>> > > on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop
>> that
>> > > already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's
>> CDH2.
>> > >
>> > > -Todd
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
>> > > m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello all,
>> > > >
>> > > > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
>> > requirements
>> > > > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2
>> patches
>> > > are
>> > > > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
>> > > apply
>> > > > Todd Lipcon's patch at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
>> > > > .
>> > > > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures
>> have
>> > > > changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Raghava.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Todd Lipcon
>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>
>
Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com>.
Hello Todd,
Oh, then isn't it a bit contradictory to the instructions on HBase overview
page.
http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
It says that the current version of HBase works only with 0.20.X and asks
users to apply the patch HDFS-630 but that patch is not available for
0.20.X. Is there any work around for this? Is that patch really required?
Thank you.
Regards,
Raghava.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Todd,
> >
> > Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop
> is
> > installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop
> first.
> > Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
> > have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
> > development,
> > there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
> > isn't it?
> >
>
> No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
> wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
> stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Raghava,
> > >
> > > Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
> > > applies
> > > on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
> > > already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
> > >
> > > -Todd
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> > > m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
> > requirements
> > > > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2
> patches
> > > are
> > > > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
> > > apply
> > > > Todd Lipcon's patch at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
> > > > .
> > > > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
> > > > changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Raghava.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Todd Lipcon
> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Todd,
>
> Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop is
> installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop first.
> Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
> have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in
> development,
> there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
> isn't it?
>
No, it was not considered for release in Hadoop 0.20.X because it breaks
wire compatibility, and though I've done a workaround to avoid issues
stemming from that, it would be unlikely to pass a backport vote.
-Todd
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Raghava,
> >
> > Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
> > applies
> > on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
> > already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> > m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the
> requirements
> > > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches
> > are
> > > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
> > apply
> > > Todd Lipcon's patch at
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
> > > .
> > > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
> > > changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Raghava.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Raghava Mutharaju <m....@gmail.com>.
Hello Todd,
Thank you for the reply. In the cluster I use here, apache Hadoop is
installed. So I have to use that. I am trying out HBase on my laptop first.
Even though I install CDH2, it won't be useful because on the cluster, I
have to work with apache Hadoop. Since version 0.21 is still in development,
there should be a HDFS-630 patch for the current stable release of Hadoop
isn't it?
Regards,
Raghava.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Raghava,
>
> Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it
> applies
> on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
> already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
> m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
> > (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches
> are
> > for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I
> apply
> > Todd Lipcon's patch at
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
> > .
> > Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
> > changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
> >
> >
> >
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
> >
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raghava.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: HDFS-630 patch for Hadoop v0.20
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Hi Raghava,
Yes, that's a patch targeted at 0.20, but I'm not certain whether it applies
on the vanilla 0.20 code or not. If you'd like a version of Hadoop that
already has it applied and tested, I'd recommend using Cloudera's CDH2.
-Todd
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Raghava Mutharaju <
m.vijayaraghava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to install HBase and while going through the requirements
> (link below), it asked me to apply HDFS-630 patch. The latest 2 patches are
> for Hadoop 0.21. I am using version 0.20. For this version, should I apply
> Todd Lipcon's patch at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430230/hdfs-630-0.20.txt
> .
> Would this be the right patch to apply? The directory structures have
> changed from 0.20 to 0.21.
>
>
> http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase/docs/current/api/overview-summary.html#requirements
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Raghava.
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera