You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> on 2012/12/03 12:27:29 UTC
[OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon 1.0.11.
> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
> 1.0.12.
Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
On 12/3/2012 5:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 03.12.2012 12:27, Jess Holle wrote:
>> On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon
>>>> 1.0.11.
>>> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
>>> 1.0.12.
>> Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
>> 1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-268
>
> Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-245 was solved
> incompletely, so https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-269 was
> raised. That one isn't a regression/showstopper though.
So for procrun, 269 is of interest, but not a regression, and 1.0.11
will do for now. [1.0.11 was key in actually allowing automatic
restart, etc, actions upon service failure.]
Thanks.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [OT] was Re: Time for 7.0.34
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 03.12.2012 12:27, Jess Holle wrote:
> On 12/3/2012 5:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 03/12/2012 11:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 1. I think we need to switch over to the recently released Daemon
>>> 1.0.11.
>> There is a regression that needs to be fixed. I think we should wait for
>> 1.0.12.
> Can you elaborate on the regression? [Having just moved to procrun
> 1.0.11 for something else, I'm quite interested.]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-268
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-245 was solved
incompletely, so https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-269 was
raised. That one isn't a regression/showstopper though.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org