You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/11 00:05:46 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-692) Filter implicit join optimization incorrect

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andy Seaborne updated JENA-692:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: Q.rq
                D.ttl

> Filter implicit join optimization incorrect
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-692
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.0, Jena 2.11.1
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>         Attachments: D.ttl, Q.rq
>
>
> (Starts at 2.11.0; 2.10.* is OK)
> The filter implicit join optimization misoptimizes the example - it pushes in the equality but each arm is missing one of the variables.
> {noformat}
> PREFIX : <http://example.org/>
> SELECT *
> {
>   { ?a :p :o1 }
>   UNION
>   { ?b :p ?a }
>   FILTER ( ?a = ?b )
> }
> {noformat}
> The first arm of the UNION does include ?b and so {{( ?a = ?b )}} is false by being an error with unbound {{?b}}
> the optimization creates:
> {noformat}
> (prefix ((: <http://example.org/>))
>   (assign ((?a ?b))
>     (union
>       (bgp (triple ?b :p :o1))
>       (bgp (triple ?b :p ?b)))))
> {noformat}
> which has replaces the {{?a}} with {{?b}} in the first arm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)