You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/11 00:05:46 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (JENA-692) Filter implicit join optimization
incorrect
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-692:
-------------------------------
Attachment: Q.rq
D.ttl
> Filter implicit join optimization incorrect
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-692
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-692
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.0, Jena 2.11.1
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Attachments: D.ttl, Q.rq
>
>
> (Starts at 2.11.0; 2.10.* is OK)
> The filter implicit join optimization misoptimizes the example - it pushes in the equality but each arm is missing one of the variables.
> {noformat}
> PREFIX : <http://example.org/>
> SELECT *
> {
> { ?a :p :o1 }
> UNION
> { ?b :p ?a }
> FILTER ( ?a = ?b )
> }
> {noformat}
> The first arm of the UNION does include ?b and so {{( ?a = ?b )}} is false by being an error with unbound {{?b}}
> the optimization creates:
> {noformat}
> (prefix ((: <http://example.org/>))
> (assign ((?a ?b))
> (union
> (bgp (triple ?b :p :o1))
> (bgp (triple ?b :p ?b)))))
> {noformat}
> which has replaces the {{?a}} with {{?b}} in the first arm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)