You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> on 2006/11/28 18:50:55 UTC
[VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
to download the distributions, review them and test them in your environment
if you have not done so already before voting.
The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid committers
and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, I will ask
one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the Incubator's general
list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the Milestone 1 release.
For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are available at
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
The release candidates are available at
http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Here is my +1
Regards
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
>> Also if were the Python and Ruby code is also in the zip we need to
>> ensure that the zip is correctly labeled.
>>
>> qpid-python....
>> qpid-ruby....
>>
>> or
>>
>> qpid-java-python-ruby
>>
Yeah, I don't know why I included Python, Ruby in the header as they are
not in the zip that we are
voting on or any of the RC's we tested/reviewed and not part of this
vote. Sorry for that...
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
Martin Ritchie wrote:
> The source zip contains release3.tar.gz which is the RC3 release
> builds hence the extra 30Meg
yes I just found that.
>
> Other than that it looks ok.. I can't test at home as I don't have the
> right java. Will do so tomorow.
>
> On 28/11/06, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Also if were the Python and Ruby code is also in the zip we need to
>> ensure that the zip is correctly labeled.
>>
>> qpid-python....
>> qpid-ruby....
>>
>> or
>>
>> qpid-java-python-ruby
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28/11/06, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > The source build doesn't seem right. At 37Meg it is going take me 20
>> > minutes from now to download and check. My guess is that release
>> > wasn't done from a fresh checkout.
>> > The RC3 src zip was only 7.1Meg.
>> >
>> > On 28/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > +1 from me.
>> > >
>> > > Rajith
>> > >
>> > > On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take
>> some time
>> > > > to download the distributions, review them and test them in your
>> > > > environment
>> > > > if you have not done so already before voting.
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>> > > >
>> > > > At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid
>> > > > committers
>> > > > and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is
>> positive, I will
>> > > > ask
>> > > > one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the
>> Incubator's
>> > > > general
>> > > > list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the
>> Milestone 1
>> > > > release.
>> > > > For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are
>> available
>> > > > at
>> > > >
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The release candidates are available at
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
>> > > >
>> > > > They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
>> > > > the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Please cast your votes:
>> > > > [ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
>> > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Here is my +1
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > Carl.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martin Ritchie
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Ritchie
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
The source zip contains release3.tar.gz which is the RC3 release
builds hence the extra 30Meg
Other than that it looks ok.. I can't test at home as I don't have the
right java. Will do so tomorow.
On 28/11/06, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> Also if were the Python and Ruby code is also in the zip we need to
> ensure that the zip is correctly labeled.
>
> qpid-python....
> qpid-ruby....
>
> or
>
> qpid-java-python-ruby
>
>
>
> On 28/11/06, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> > The source build doesn't seem right. At 37Meg it is going take me 20
> > minutes from now to download and check. My guess is that release
> > wasn't done from a fresh checkout.
> > The RC3 src zip was only 7.1Meg.
> >
> > On 28/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
> > > > to download the distributions, review them and test them in your
> > > > environment
> > > > if you have not done so already before voting.
> > > >
> > > > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid
> > > > committers
> > > > and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, I will
> > > > ask
> > > > one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the Incubator's
> > > > general
> > > > list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the Milestone 1
> > > > release.
> > > > For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are available
> > > > at
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The release candidates are available at
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
> > > >
> > > > They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
> > > > the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please cast your votes:
> > > > [ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> > > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is my +1
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Carl.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Ritchie
> >
>
>
> --
> Martin Ritchie
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
Also if were the Python and Ruby code is also in the zip we need to
ensure that the zip is correctly labeled.
qpid-python....
qpid-ruby....
or
qpid-java-python-ruby
On 28/11/06, Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org> wrote:
> The source build doesn't seem right. At 37Meg it is going take me 20
> minutes from now to download and check. My guess is that release
> wasn't done from a fresh checkout.
> The RC3 src zip was only 7.1Meg.
>
> On 28/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
> > > to download the distributions, review them and test them in your
> > > environment
> > > if you have not done so already before voting.
> > >
> > > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> > >
> > > At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid
> > > committers
> > > and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, I will
> > > ask
> > > one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the Incubator's
> > > general
> > > list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the Milestone 1
> > > release.
> > > For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are available
> > > at
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> > >
> > >
> > > The release candidates are available at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
> > >
> > > They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
> > > the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please cast your votes:
> > > [ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is my +1
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Carl.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Martin Ritchie
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
The source build doesn't seem right. At 37Meg it is going take me 20
minutes from now to download and check. My guess is that release
wasn't done from a fresh checkout.
The RC3 src zip was only 7.1Meg.
On 28/11/06, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Rajith
>
> On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
> > to download the distributions, review them and test them in your
> > environment
> > if you have not done so already before voting.
> >
> > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >
> > At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid
> > committers
> > and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, I will
> > ask
> > one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the Incubator's
> > general
> > list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the Milestone 1
> > release.
> > For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are available
> > at
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >
> >
> > The release candidates are available at
> > http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
> >
> > They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
> > the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
> >
> >
> > Please cast your votes:
> > [ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Regards
> > Carl.
> >
> >
>
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
Here's my vote:
[X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
All seems well on my Windows (XP SP1) machine
On 30/11/06, Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here's my vote:
>
> [X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
>
> FYI I've tried starting and connecting a test class to the broker on:
>
> Windows XP (2002 SP 1)
> Linux ( 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp)
> Unix (SunOS 5.8)
>
> All successful.
>
> Regards,
> Marnie
>
> ps BTW I agree with Alan about making the install dir name consistent across
> archives and will raise a JIRA for it just now for future releases.
>
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Hi All,
Here's my vote:
[X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
FYI I've tried starting and connecting a test class to the broker on:
Windows XP (2002 SP 1)
Linux ( 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp)
Unix (SunOS 5.8)
All successful.
Regards,
Marnie
ps BTW I agree with Alan about making the install dir name consistent across
archives and will raise a JIRA for it just now for future releases.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Alan Conway <ac...@redhat.com>.
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 10:40 -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> The .zip files are targeted at the windows community and the .tar.gz files
> are targeted at the linux/unix communities.
> Of course u can use unzip to work with zip files in linux/unix but the
> preference is for .tar.gz.
Understood - I was confused by the fact that the relase-M1.tar.gz
contained both. That would make no sense if it was part of the release
(because you need tar.gz to get to the zips) but I now understand that
it is not, its just a convenience for testers.
Aside: "Convenience for testers" is a red flag for me. If there is
anything inconvenient about downloading, installing and testing the real
kit, then we should fix the kit, not provide a convenience for testers
that won't be available to users. That's not a showstopper though, more
a suggestion for next release.
Cheers,
Alan.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Alan,
The .zip files are targeted at the windows community and the .tar.gz files
are targeted at the linux/unix communities.
Of course u can use unzip to work with zip files in linux/unix but the
preference is for .tar.gz.
So it's like we serve our ice-cream in chocolate and vanila flavor and
people will use what they like most :)
Regards,
Rajith.
On 11/29/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Also release-M1.tar.gz contains both the .tar.gz files AND the .zip
> > files which makes no sense at all. Why do we even produce .zip files?
> > Last time I looked winzip can handle tar.gz files, and tar.gz is smaller
> > than .zip. If we must generate both then we need separate
> > release-M1.tar.gz and .zip. Also I always find it highly annoying when
> > people pack .tar.gz files inside other .tar.gz files. Why not just a
> > release.tar.gz file that directly expands to the content of all the
> > qpid-*.tar.gz file.
> >
>
> when we put them up on the download site we will put the tar's up in one
> section and zip's up
> in another section. This is just a tarball of all the packages that we
> will distribute. make sense?
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
> Also release-M1.tar.gz contains both the .tar.gz files AND the .zip
> files which makes no sense at all. Why do we even produce .zip files?
> Last time I looked winzip can handle tar.gz files, and tar.gz is smaller
> than .zip. If we must generate both then we need separate
> release-M1.tar.gz and .zip. Also I always find it highly annoying when
> people pack .tar.gz files inside other .tar.gz files. Why not just a
> release.tar.gz file that directly expands to the content of all the
> qpid-*.tar.gz file.
>
when we put them up on the download site we will put the tar's up in one
section and zip's up
in another section. This is just a tarball of all the packages that we
will distribute. make sense?
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Alan Conway <ac...@redhat.com>.
How are these things supposed to be unpacked? The client README says to
"set the QPID_HOME environment variable to
distribution directory and add $QPID_HOME/bin to your PATH." However all
the qpid-*.tar.gz unpack to different directories.
Also release-M1.tar.gz contains both the .tar.gz files AND the .zip
files which makes no sense at all. Why do we even produce .zip files?
Last time I looked winzip can handle tar.gz files, and tar.gz is smaller
than .zip. If we must generate both then we need separate
release-M1.tar.gz and .zip. Also I always find it highly annoying when
people pack .tar.gz files inside other .tar.gz files. Why not just a
release.tar.gz file that directly expands to the content of all the
qpid-*.tar.gz file.
Cheers,
Alan.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Rajith
On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
> to download the distributions, review them and test them in your
> environment
> if you have not done so already before voting.
>
> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>
> At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Qpid
> committers
> and mentors are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, I will
> ask
> one of the mentors to send a summary of this vote to the Incubator's
> general
> list to formally request the Incubator PMC to approve the Milestone 1
> release.
> For your reference the Incubator release policy guidelines are available
> at
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
>
> The release candidates are available at
> http://people.apache.org/~rajith/qpid-release/M1/
>
> They are named M1, once the vote is complete we will sign
> the jars and publish them as the final M1 release.
>
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Regards
> Carl.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Robert Greig <ro...@gmail.com>.
[X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Sorry about the mix up.
I have the RC build from scratch again at the same location
Rajith
On 11/28/06, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Please cast your votes:
> > [X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Apart from the source issue already mentioned it looks good (I only saw
> java related packages though). The broker starts fine and seems to work
> with some simple client tests (I didn't actually run any tests for the
> client release but it looked ok). So +1 from me.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
> Please cast your votes:
> [X] +1 Release the source and binaries as Qpid Milestone 1 (M1)
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Apart from the source issue already mentioned it looks good (I only saw
java related packages though). The broker starts fine and seems to work
with some simple client tests (I didn't actually run any tests for the
client release but it looked ok). So +1 from me.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
+1 from this mentor.
Paul
On 12/2/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I believe that we should extend the vote through Monday as it appears
> that 2 of our
> mentors have been off-line during our vote period. Let's see where we
> stand Monday.
>
> Regards,
> Carl.
>
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
I believe that we should extend the vote through Monday as it appears
that 2 of our
mentors have been off-line during our vote period. Let's see where we
stand Monday.
Regards,
Carl.
Re: [VOTE] Relaese Qpid Milestone 1 - (Java, Python, Ruby)
Posted by Cliff Schmidt <cl...@gmail.com>.
On 11/28/06, Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release. Please take some time
> to download the distributions, review them and test them in your environment
> if you have not done so already before voting.
+1
Cliff