You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by "Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/07/19 23:41:16 UTC
[jira] Updated: (NUTCH-323) CrawlDatum.set just reference a
mapWritable of a other object but not copy it.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-323?page=all ]
Stefan Groschupf updated NUTCH-323:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: MapWritableCopyConstructor.patch
Attached patch add a copy constructor to the map writable and use it in the CrawlDatum.set methode. However there are more methods in the code where meta data are passed from one CrawlDatum to a other, but I don't can see any risk of concurent usage of the mapWritable there.
> CrawlDatum.set just reference a mapWritable of a other object but not copy it.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-323
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-323
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8-dev
> Reporter: Stefan Groschupf
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.8-dev
>
> Attachments: MapWritableCopyConstructor.patch
>
>
> Using CrawlDatum.set(aOtherCrawlDatum) copies the data from one CrawlDatum to a other.
> Also a reference of the MapWritable is passed. Means both project share the same mapWritable and its content.
> This causes problems with concurent manipulate mapWritables and its key-value tuples.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira