[DISCUSS] Some problems encountered during the use of the SeaTunnel engine

[binbincheng <74...@qq.com.INVALID>]

Wechat group "Apache Linkis community Development group " chat records are as follows:


arbor:
Who can guide me on the use of the SeaTunnel engine? I failed to submit the task and there is no log.


arbor:
Big guys. Does the task submitted by OnceEngineConn in this way not generate historical tasks? Only the tasks submitted through the execute interface will generate jobs?


@peacewong @WDS
@LiMeng Big brother, help me to see


Xi Shihao:
It should be, it looks like there is no storage now


arbor:
Hmm, that’s normal. I checked it too, but I didn’t see the logic for generating job records.


arbor:
That felt a little unfriendly. Is there any need to optimize @peacewong@WDS


arbor:
For example, the seattunnel engine seems to only support the submission of OnceEngineConn


@peacewong @WDS
Now the information of ec is stored


arbor:
Well, ec can see the records


@peacewong @WDS
Later, you can indeed add a task information field in the ec record table


Xi Shihao:
I feel like I can add some other information, but I can’t tell the difference now, so I have to click inside to see


Xi Shihao:
You can add some custom information for display


Li Meng:
Yes



-----------------




微信群“Apache Linkis社区开发群”聊天记录
如下面所述：



乔木：
SeaTunnel引擎的使用哪位大佬能指导一下啊 我这提交任务失败 也没有日志呢


乔木：
大佬们。使用这种方式OnceEngineConn提交的任务是不是不会生成历史任务 只有通过execute接口提交的任务才会生成job吗?


@peacewong@WDS
@Dlimeng_李孟 大佬 帮忙看看


郗世豪：
应该是，看着现在没有存


乔木：
嗯嗯 那就正常的 我也看了一下 没有看到生成job记录的逻辑


乔木：
那感觉这样有点不太友好。有没有必要优化一下@peacewong@WDS


乔木：
比如seatunnel引擎现在好像只支持OnceEngineConn的方式提交


@peacewong@WDS
现在存储的是ec的信息


乔木：
嗯 ec是能看到记录的


@peacewong@WDS
后面确实可以ec记录表里面加个任务信息字段


郗世豪：
感觉可以加点别的信息进来，现在没法区分，还得点进里面看


郗世豪：
可以加点自定义信息作展示


李孟：
是的