You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by harald <su...@rainyday.de> on 2014/05/30 15:11:23 UTC
Two local smx installations // jetty port
Hello list,
I'm a little bit confused. To prepare a demo I installed SMX 5.0.1 into two
separate folders on the same machine. SMX-A should use port range 10xxx and
SMX-B should use 20xxx. To prepare the SMX-A instance I edited some files
within the etc folder. To define a different Jetty port I modified
org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub and system.properties. Than I started the
SMX-A instance for the first time to let SMX create the activemq.xml and the
jetty.xml. Updated these files as well and started SMX-A again.
Within the logs I see:
14:06:09,726 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl |
133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
[0.0.0.0]:[10080]
14:06:09,729 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl |
133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
[0.0.0.0]:[8181]
Is there any easy explanation why jetty is still listening on port 8181??
And maybe .. is there an easy way of redefining the port completely?
For curiosity I prepared SMX-B as well and used the proper port range. It's
only complaining about the jetty setup with the expected message: Caused by:
java.net.BindException: Address already in use
Thanks for any hint!
harald
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Two local smx installations // jetty port
Posted by harald <su...@rainyday.de>.
Hi Achim,
how should I say. Not the first time :) ..
Thanks for your answer!
Harald
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569p5720580.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Two local smx installations // jetty port
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
Did you rename the file or is it still called x.stub?
Regards, Achim
sent from mobile device
Am 30.05.2014 15:53 schrieb "harald" <su...@rainyday.de>:
> Hello list,
> I'm a little bit confused. To prepare a demo I installed SMX 5.0.1 into two
> separate folders on the same machine. SMX-A should use port range 10xxx and
> SMX-B should use 20xxx. To prepare the SMX-A instance I edited some files
> within the etc folder. To define a different Jetty port I modified
> org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub and system.properties. Than I started the
> SMX-A instance for the first time to let SMX create the activemq.xml and
> the
> jetty.xml. Updated these files as well and started SMX-A again.
>
> Within the logs I see:
> 14:06:09,726 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl
> |
> 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
> [0.0.0.0]:[10080]
> 14:06:09,729 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl
> |
> 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
> [0.0.0.0]:[8181]
>
> Is there any easy explanation why jetty is still listening on port 8181??
> And maybe .. is there an easy way of redefining the port completely?
>
> For curiosity I prepared SMX-B as well and used the proper port range. It's
> only complaining about the jetty setup with the expected message: Caused
> by:
> java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>
> Thanks for any hint!
> harald
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Two local smx installations // jetty port
Posted by harald <su...@rainyday.de>.
Hi JB,
thanks for your answer - and you are right. As I wrote I edited
org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub .. and while writing down my notes I
realised that ...empty.stub tries to tell something ;) .. so I started all
over and additionally copied the org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub file to
org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg and did a restart.
SMX-A is now listening on port 10080 which is the configured HTTP port.
SMX-B is now listening on port 20080 which is the configured HTTP port on
this instance.
Thanks,
Harald
--
View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569p5720578.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Two local smx installations // jetty port
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Harald,
it's probably due to the "default" connector started by pax web.
You have to provide/update the port in etc/org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg (in
addition of the etc/jetty.xml).
Regards
JB
On 05/30/2014 03:11 PM, harald wrote:
> Hello list,
> I'm a little bit confused. To prepare a demo I installed SMX 5.0.1 into two
> separate folders on the same machine. SMX-A should use port range 10xxx and
> SMX-B should use 20xxx. To prepare the SMX-A instance I edited some files
> within the etc folder. To define a different Jetty port I modified
> org.ops4j.pax.web.cfg.empty.stub and system.properties. Than I started the
> SMX-A instance for the first time to let SMX create the activemq.xml and the
> jetty.xml. Updated these files as well and started SMX-A again.
>
> Within the logs I see:
> 14:06:09,726 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl |
> 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
> [0.0.0.0]:[10080]
> 14:06:09,729 | INFO | b Runtime worker | JettyServerImpl |
> 133 - org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-jetty - 1.1.17 | Pax Web available at
> [0.0.0.0]:[8181]
>
> Is there any easy explanation why jetty is still listening on port 8181??
> And maybe .. is there an easy way of redefining the port completely?
>
> For curiosity I prepared SMX-B as well and used the proper port range. It's
> only complaining about the jetty setup with the expected message: Caused by:
> java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>
> Thanks for any hint!
> harald
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Two-local-smx-installations-jetty-port-tp5720569.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com