You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to qa@openoffice.apache.org by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> on 2013/03/01 16:48:53 UTC
Re: Feedback on work
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com> wrote:
> This bug is an example where the description given by the originator is not reproducible, but while confirming it one discovers another bug.
> I assumed it is better to confirm it and describe the new bug than resolving it and opening a separate new bug.
>
> Thank you very much for your reassurance.
>
> PS I'd rather not add my information on wiki, after all I expect nothing in return for volunteering...
>
The information in the wiki is useful so we know who can test on what
platform, who has a printer, MS Office, knows scripting, etc. It
helps when we receive a bug report that requires specific 3rd party
apps or skills to reproduce. But it is OK if you do not want to be
listed.
> PPS I subscribed to the documentation list but get no emails from it?
>
Nothing at all? Try subscribing again by sending a note to
doc-subscribe@openoffice.apache.org. It will give you an error if
you are already subscribed.
Regards,
-Rob
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, at 1:29, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com> wrote:
>>
>> Finally, in this one issue I was confused. You marked it as
>> confirmed, but your comment makes it sound like you did not see what
>> the user reported. Your comment sounds like the data imported
>> corrected:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
>>
>> Oh, one other thing: Could you add your information to this wiki page?
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/QA+Testing+Preferences
>>
>> Thanks for your hard work!
>>
>> -Rob
>>
Re: Feedback on work
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
Please see: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#using-mailing-lists
Regards,
-Rob
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:31 AM, lgmattana@alice.it <lg...@alice.it> wrote:
> unsubscribe
> please.
> Best regards.
> Luigi G. Mattana
>
>
> Il 2013-03-01 16:48, Rob Weir ha scritto:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This bug is an example where the description given by the originator is
>>> not reproducible, but while confirming it one discovers another bug.
>>> I assumed it is better to confirm it and describe the new bug than
>>> resolving it and opening a separate new bug.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your reassurance.
>>>
>>> PS I'd rather not add my information on wiki, after all I expect nothing
>>> in return for volunteering...
>>>
>> The information in the wiki is useful so we know who can test on what
>> platform, who has a printer, MS Office, knows scripting, etc. It
>> helps when we receive a bug report that requires specific 3rd party
>> apps or skills to reproduce. But it is OK if you do not want to be
>> listed.
>>
>>> PPS I subscribed to the documentation list but get no emails from it?
>>>
>> Nothing at all? Try subscribing again by sending a note to
>> doc-subscribe@openoffice.apache.org. It will give you an error if
>> you are already subscribed.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, at 1:29, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Finally, in this one issue I was confused. You marked it as
>>>> confirmed, but your comment makes it sound like you did not see what
>>>> the user reported. Your comment sounds like the data imported
>>>> corrected:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
>>>>
>>>> Oh, one other thing: Could you add your information to this wiki page?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/QA+Testing+Preferences
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your hard work!
>>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>
Re: Feedback on work
Posted by "lgmattana@alice.it" <lg...@alice.it>.
unsubscribe
please.
Best regards.
Luigi G. Mattana
Il 2013-03-01 16:48, Rob Weir ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com> wrote:
>> This bug is an example where the description given by the originator is not reproducible, but while confirming it one discovers another bug.
>> I assumed it is better to confirm it and describe the new bug than resolving it and opening a separate new bug.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your reassurance.
>>
>> PS I'd rather not add my information on wiki, after all I expect nothing in return for volunteering...
>>
> The information in the wiki is useful so we know who can test on what
> platform, who has a printer, MS Office, knows scripting, etc. It
> helps when we receive a bug report that requires specific 3rd party
> apps or skills to reproduce. But it is OK if you do not want to be
> listed.
>
>> PPS I subscribed to the documentation list but get no emails from it?
>>
> Nothing at all? Try subscribing again by sending a note to
> doc-subscribe@openoffice.apache.org. It will give you an error if
> you are already subscribed.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, at 1:29, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, AOO Volunteer <el...@mail-page.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally, in this one issue I was confused. You marked it as
>>> confirmed, but your comment makes it sound like you did not see what
>>> the user reported. Your comment sounds like the data imported
>>> corrected:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87885
>>>
>>> Oh, one other thing: Could you add your information to this wiki page?
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/QA+Testing+Preferences
>>>
>>> Thanks for your hard work!
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>